wine-devel June 2014

wine-devel@winehq.org

43 participants
148 discussions

Start a nNew thread

Re: [1/2] imagehlp: Implement (parts of) BindImageEx (try 8)
by Marvin 02 Jun '14

02 Jun '14

1 0

Video memory size detection in D3D
by Ruslan Kabatsayev 02 Jun '14

02 Jun '14

Hello all, It seems Wine doesn't use any way to reliably detect video memory size, and for many video cards needs it to be specified as HKCU\Software\Wine\Direct3D\VideoMemorySize key in registry. But there exist at least three (vendor-specific) GL/GLX extensions which seem to address exactly this. Namely, for Mesa it's GLX_MESA_query_renderer [1], for nVidia it's GL_NVX_gpu_memory_info [2], and for ATI/AMD it's GL_ATI_meminfo [3]. Mesa extension is shipping starting from Mesa 10.0, nVidia ships their extension in 195.XX drivers (said in specification; I have it exposed with my 313.09 driver), don't know status of ATI extension though (marked as "???" in spec). It'd be good if Wine could utilize these. Is there any work towards this already? Regards, Ruslan [1]: http://www.opengl.org/registry/specs/MESA/glx_query_renderer.txt [2]: https://www.opengl.org/registry/specs/NVX/gpu_memory_info.txt [3]: http://www.opengl.org/registry/specs/ATI/meminfo.txt

5 6

New Wine patches
by Chakke, Neha (GE Oil & Gas) 02 Jun '14

02 Jun '14

Hello , I am trying to run a GE software and hardware on Debian (Linux platform) using WineHQ. In order to run the hardware we need to install device drivers for USB (Cypress) . http://wiki.winehq.org/USB I have been trying to look for some solutions online since a week. Could you kindly send me the new wine patches and please guide me with the procedure. Thanks and regards, Miss Neha Chakke Engineering/Technology GE Oil & Gas Measurement & Control T: +49 (0) 2233 601 123 neha.chakke(a)ge.com<mailto:neha.chakke@ge.com> www.ge-mcs.com<http://www.ge-mcs.com/> [NewMeatball] GE Sensing & Inspection Technologies GmbH Robert-Bosch-Str. 3 50354 Hürth Germany

3 2

Re: [PATCH 3/3] vbscript: Fixed CInt(try 2)
by Marvin 02 Jun '14

02 Jun '14

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=7387 Your paranoid android. === w2000pro (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wxppro (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wvistau64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w7u (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w8 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wvistau64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/3] vbscript: Implemented CLng(try 2)
by Marvin 02 Jun '14

02 Jun '14

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=7386 Your paranoid android. === w2000pro (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wxppro (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wvistau64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w7u (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w8 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wvistau64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/3] vbscript: Implemented CDbl(try 2)
by Marvin 02 Jun '14

02 Jun '14

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=7385 Your paranoid android. === w2000pro (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wxppro (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wvistau64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w7u (32 bit) === No test summary line found === w8 (32 bit) === No test summary line found === wvistau64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found === w2008s64 (64 bit) === No test summary line found

1 0

Re: shlwapi/tests: Skip if test ini file wasn't created
by Marvin 01 Jun '14

01 Jun '14

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=7382 Your paranoid android. === wvistau64 (32 bit ordinal) === ordinal.c:1934: Test failed: expected (L"01 \062c\0648\0627\0646, 2014") got (L"\200f01 \200f\062c\0648\0627\0646, \200f2") for date part ordinal.c:1960: Test failed: expected (L"01 \062c\0648\0627\0646, 2014") got (L"\200f01 \200f\062c\0648\0627\0646, \200f2") for date part === wvistau64 (64 bit ordinal) === ordinal.c:1934: Test failed: expected (L"01 \062c\0648\0627\0646, 2014") got (L"\200f01 \200f\062c\0648\0627\0646, \200f2") for date part ordinal.c:1960: Test failed: expected (L"01 \062c\0648\0627\0646, 2014") got (L"\200f01 \200f\062c\0648\0627\0646, \200f2") for date part

2 1

Re: ntdll: Use lockfree implementation for get_cached_fd. (try 2)
by Ken Thomases 01 Jun '14

01 Jun '14

On May 31, 2014, at 12:05 PM, Sebastian Lackner wrote: > Changes in try 2: > > * Always try to access the fd cache two times - this ensures that we > don't release a file descriptor when its still in use by a second thread. Heh. Well, you can ignore that part of my reply to your previous try. :) > * Replace interlocked_xchg() with an assert(). The original code looks > like its valid that the fd is nonzero at this point, but in fact this > would cause releasing a file descriptor which is still in use. I'll leave it to others to comment on that. > Replacing with an assert() also saves a couple of CPU cycles. I understand that this is an attempt to improve performance, but I don't think it's necessary to squeeze every last CPU cycle out of this code. -Ken

2 1

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-devel June 2014