On 07/28/14 16:58, Zhenbo Li wrote:
> My code is a little ugly, and I'm wondering if there is a better
> solution.
Is there any reason why you don't use nsIDOMHTMLInputElement::GetForm?
Jacek
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8122
Your paranoid android.
=== w2000pro (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== wxppro (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== wvistau64 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== w2008s64 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== w7u (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== w8 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== wvistau64 (64 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== w2008s64 (64 bit) ===
No test summary line found
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8121
Your paranoid android.
=== w2000pro (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== wxppro (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== wvistau64 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== w2008s64 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== w7u (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== w8 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== wvistau64 (64 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== w2008s64 (64 bit) ===
No test summary line found
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8120
Your paranoid android.
=== w2000pro (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== wxppro (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== wvistau64 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== w2008s64 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== w7u (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== w8 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== wvistau64 (64 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== w2008s64 (64 bit) ===
No test summary line found
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8119
Your paranoid android.
=== w2000pro (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== wxppro (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== wvistau64 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== w2008s64 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== w7u (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== w8 (32 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== wvistau64 (64 bit) ===
No test summary line found
=== w2008s64 (64 bit) ===
No test summary line found
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8117
Your paranoid android.
=== build (build) ===
Patch failed to apply
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8116
Your paranoid android.
=== build (build) ===
Patch failed to apply
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8115
Your paranoid android.
=== build (build) ===
Patch failed to apply
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=8114
Your paranoid android.
=== build (build) ===
Patch failed to apply
I made a partial fix of this bug -
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17982, only for the PATCOPY rop.
It's based on the observation that the Polygon() function does
support arbitrary parallelograms, including when defined through the XFORM
matrix, so for PATCOPY we can just delegate the implementation to it (with
a NULL_PEN because PatBlt doesn't use a pen).
Is this patch acceptable? I have no idea if delegating to Polygon() will
hurt performance. If that is a concern, I can do it only in case the
physical coordinates after the world transform are not rectangular.
If it is, I will submit it to wine-patches, then.