wine-devel October 2016

wine-devel@winehq.org

45 participants
122 discussions

Re: [PATCH] winebus.sys: Remove dead code
by Sebastian Lackner 28 Oct '16

28 Oct '16

It is dead code, but I don't think putting it in a comment makes it better. In general, commented out code should be avoided because it is not checked by the compiler. In addition, we might want to implement driver unloading in the near future, and will have to add the code back then (including the "if" because failures to create the monitor are not critical). 2016-10-28 3:00 GMT+02:00 Aric Stewart <aric(a)codeweavers.com>: > > Coverity 1373717 > > Signed-off-by: Aric Stewart <aric(a)codeweavers.com> > --- > dlls/winebus.sys/bus_udev.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > >

2 1

Cmd.exe test cases
by Carlos Rafael Ramirez 28 Oct '16

28 Oct '16

Hello, I want to add some test cases to cmd program. But I don't understand the structure of them. Where to put the command and where to put the assertion or expected output? I am coding a patch and I want to make it like TDD, first the test fail and after the fix the test passes. Thank you

2 1

Re: [3/3] hidclass.sys: Only return new reports when reading data from ringbuffer.
by Aric Stewart 27 Oct '16

27 Oct '16

On 10/27/16 9:45 AM, Sebastian Lackner wrote: > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Lackner <sebastian(a)fds-team.de> > --- > > Depending on the buffer size, we might get a huge amount of old reports otherwise. > > @ Aric: I believe there are some more things wrong with the ringbuffer implementation. > We shouldn't really need a ->start pointer, this is exactly what the ring->pointers[] > are used for. Also, the current implementation never uses all slots. > Reviews on the ringbuffer code is very welcome! Thanks! It has been a while since I did that implementation but if I recall the purpose for start and end is about tracking the writing positions, It was more important before this patch, but after this patch you are correct that start is no longer needed. 2 -aric > dlls/hidclass.sys/buffer.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/dlls/hidclass.sys/buffer.c b/dlls/hidclass.sys/buffer.c > index 14e83e4..0b29f97 100644 > --- a/dlls/hidclass.sys/buffer.c > +++ b/dlls/hidclass.sys/buffer.c > @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ UINT RingBuffer_AddPointer(struct ReportRingBuffer *ring) > for( ;count < ring->pointer_alloc; count++) > ring->pointers[count] = POINTER_UNUSED; > } > - ring->pointers[idx] = ring->start; > + ring->pointers[idx] = ring->end; > LeaveCriticalSection(&ring->lock); > return idx; > } >

1 0

Re: [PATCH] ucrtbase: Added _sopen_dispatch/_wsopen_dispatch
by Huw Davies 27 Oct '16

27 Oct '16

On 27 Oct 2016, at 17:17, Nikolay Sivov <nsivov(a)codeweavers.com> wrote: > diff --git a/dlls/msvcrt/file.c b/dlls/msvcrt/file.c > index 432d5c7..9097598 100644 > --- a/dlls/msvcrt/file.c > +++ b/dlls/msvcrt/file.c > @@ -2330,6 +2330,18 @@ int CDECL MSVCRT__wsopen( const MSVCRT_wchar_t *path, int oflags, int shflags, . > } > > /********************************************************************* > + * _wsopen_dispatch (UCRTBASE.@) > + */ > +int CDECL MSVCRT__wsopen_dispatch( const MSVCRT_wchar_t *path, int oflags, int shflags, > + int pmode, int *filehandle, int secure) > +{ > + if (secure) > + FIXME("secure argument ignored.\n"); > + > + return MSVCRT__wsopen_s( filehandle, path, oflags, shflags, pmode ); > +} Wouldn’t it make more sense to have _wsopen() and _wsopen_s() call _wsopen_dispatch() (and likewise for the char* version)? Huw.

1 0

Re: ntdll: Add ApiSetQueryApiSetPresence stub.
by Nikolay Sivov 27 Oct '16

27 Oct '16

Do you have a program that needs this?

1 0

Re: ntdll: Forward EtwEventRegister() from EventRegister().
by Nikolay Sivov 27 Oct '16

27 Oct '16

> --- a/dlls/ntdll/ntdll.spec > +++ b/dlls/ntdll/ntdll.spec > @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ > # @ stub DbgUiStopDebugging > @ stub DbgUiWaitStateChange > @ stdcall DbgUserBreakPoint() > +@ stdcall EtwEventRegister(ptr ptr ptr ptr) advapi32.EventRegister This won't do it. Advapi32 should forward to ntdll, not the other way around.

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/2] edit: Test that EM_REPLACESEL works after EM_GETHANDLE.
by Sebastian Lackner 26 Oct '16

26 Oct '16

On 27.10.2016 00:41, Roman Pišl wrote: > Signed-off-by: Roman Pišl <rpisl(a)seznam.cz> > --- > dlls/user32/tests/edit.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+) I haven't reviewed the patch yet, but please note that the subject should start with the component (here user32), not with the filename. It was also wrong in http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/patch/ddfc5275af0081cba6e834bf9d9e35d…, but seems like Alexandre didn't notice it. ;) Best regards, Sebastian

1 0

d3dx9: d3dx9_base_effect_get_pass_desc
by Luis C. Busquets Pérez 26 Oct '16

26 Oct '16

Dear developers, I have tried to run Civ4BeyondtheSword.exe with the internal d3dx9_33.dll I can run the programme but when I start a game, it hangs. I saw that a lot of FIXME's with the message: fixme:d3dx:d3dx9_base_effect_get_pass_desc Pixel shader and vertex shader are not supported, yet. Therefore, I tried to finishing implementing the function. Find attached a patch that works. With this patch, the programme does not hang. Fell free to study, redo it or rewrite it but please I look forward to somebody who corrects it and manages to integrate that function in the wine tree so that I do not need to compile the wine. On the other hand, find attached an image, where you can see that the settler image seems to something in the middle. Furthermore, the leaders also seem to have something in the middle. Actually, it seems that the image that should be behind the leader in the bottom is in the middle of them and bend vertically when they bend. I assume this is not because of the patch but I guess that this information could serve to locate and correct another bug.

1 0

Re: [PATCH] hid: implement HidD_SetOutputReport
by Sebastian Lackner 26 Oct '16

26 Oct '16

On 24.10.2016 16:06, Aric Stewart wrote: > Also fixes an issue with IOCTL_HID_SET_FEATURE where the wrong buffers where being sent. > > Signed-off-by: Aric Stewart <aric(a)codeweavers.com> > --- > dlls/hid/hid.spec | 2 +- > dlls/hid/hidd.c | 6 ++++++ > dlls/hidclass.sys/device.c | 11 +++++++---- > include/ddk/hidsdi.h | 1 + > 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > While you are just at it, shouldn't the first char in SystemBuffer be skipped? "packet.reportBuffer = irp->AssociatedIrp.SystemBuffer;" Also, it looks like the first assignment of "irp->IoStatus.Information = 0;" is not really required, its also assigned later. Regards, Sebastian

1 0

Re: [6/6] webservices: Implement WsCall.
by Marvin 26 Oct '16

26 Oct '16

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=26297 Your paranoid android. === build (build) === Patch failed to apply

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-devel October 2016