Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=20800
Your paranoid android.
=== w2003std (32 bit comm) ===
comm.c:861: Test failed: WaitCommEvent failed with a timeout
comm.c:872: recovering after WAIT_TIMEOUT...
comm.c:882: Test failed: WaitCommEvent error 0
comm.c:883: …
[View More]Test failed: WaitCommEvent: expected EV_TXEMPTY, got 0
comm.c:887: WaitCommEvent for EV_TXEMPTY took 1500 ms (timeout 1500)
comm.c:888: Test failed: WaitCommEvent used 1500 ms for waiting
comm.c:1553: test_AbortWaitCts timeout 500 handle 00000760
comm.c:1520: Changing CommMask on the fly for handle 00000760 after timeout 500
=== w2008s64 (64 bit comm) ===
comm.c:861: Test failed: WaitCommEvent failed with a timeout
comm.c:872: recovering after WAIT_TIMEOUT...
comm.c:882: Test failed: WaitCommEvent error 0
comm.c:883: Test failed: WaitCommEvent: expected EV_TXEMPTY, got 0
comm.c:887: WaitCommEvent for EV_TXEMPTY took 1500 ms (timeout 1500)
comm.c:888: Test failed: WaitCommEvent used 1500 ms for waiting
[View Less]
On 14 February 2016 at 21:33, Stefan Dösinger <stefandoesinger(a)gmx.at> wrote:
> Going back to square one and moving around texture resources. Anything
> that's based on reassigning client library resources will make d3d11
> deferred contexts very difficult.
>
> So far I'm only moving around RGB textures and invalidating everything
> else for simplicity.
Does this do the right thing for multi-sampled swapchains?
Hey everyone,
Although I'm a student again, I don't really have the time or chops to
apply for GSoC, at least not this year. I was randomly looking up things
the other day though when I came across precompiled headers. I don't
remember seeing any sight of them when I studied wine code in the past,
and all I found on the mailing list was this:
https://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2004-July/027933.html
It might not be a hard-enough task to warrant a GSoC grant, and I don't
know …
[View More]enough about the details to add an entry to the wiki (Would
precompiled headers work for wine? Does wine actually use them already?)
I just thought I would mention it because if it makes sense for the
project, it might be an interesting change with a big payoff for build
times.
Kyle
[View Less]
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=20796
Your paranoid android.
=== wvistau64 (32 bit shlexec) ===
shlexec.c:1588: Test failed: ShellExecuteEx(mask="0x808040", file="C:\Users\Public\Documents\shell32_test.exe", params="shlexec "C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\…
[View More]Temp\wt1045.tmp\wt1046.tmp" abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxy") WaitForSingleObject(hProcess) returned 258
shlexec.c:1979: Test failed: ShellExecuteEx(mask="0x8640", file="shlproto://%TMPDIR%/bar") WaitForSingleObject returned 258
shlexec.c:1983: Test failed: ShellExecuteEx(mask="0x8640", file="shlproto://%TMPDIR%/bar") argvA3 expected 'URL', but key not found or empty
shlexec.c:1984: Test failed: ShellExecuteEx(mask="0x8640", file="shlproto://%TMPDIR%/bar") argvA4 expected 'shlproto://C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt1045.tmp/bar', but key not found or empty
[View Less]
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=20778
Your paranoid android.
=== w1064 (32 bit msg) ===
msg.c:6290: Test failed: Update region shouldn't be empty
msg.c:6524: Test failed: InvalidateErase: 0: the msg sequence is not complete: expected 0085 - actual 0000
msg.…
[View More]c:6526: Test failed: Paint: 0: the msg sequence is not complete: expected 000f - actual 0000
msg.c:6296: Test failed: Regions are different
msg.c:6296: Test failed: Regions are different
msg.c:6296: Test failed: Regions are different
[View Less]
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=20745
Your paranoid android.
=== w1064 (32 bit misc) ===
misc.c:756: Test failed: [52] wrong mime: L"image/x-icon"
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=20744
Your paranoid android.
=== w1064 (32 bit midi) ===
midi.c:290: Test failed: midiOutOpen(dev=0) rc=MMSYSERR_ERROR
midi.c:489: Test failed: midiStreamOpen(dev=-2) rc=MMSYSERR_ERROR
midi.c:290: Test failed: midiOutOpen(…
[View More]dev=-1) rc=MMSYSERR_ERROR
midi.c:489: Test failed: midiStreamOpen(dev=-2) rc=MMSYSERR_ERROR
=== w1064 (32 bit mci) ===
mci: unhandled exception c0000005 at 7698851A
[View Less]
Hi Piotr,
Thanks for your work! I didn't have time to improve the patches so I
didn't sent it upstream, I appreciate a lot for your work, now I can
remove it from my todo list :)