wine-devel January 2017

wine-devel@winehq.org

54 participants
144 discussions

Re: ddraw/tests: Spelling fixes in a few comments.
by Marvin 07 Jan '17

07 Jan '17

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=27623 Your paranoid android. === w1064 (32 bit ddraw2) === ddraw2.c:2391: Test failed: Expected (0,0)-(512,384), got (0,0)-(1024,768). === w1064 (64 bit ddraw2) === ddraw2.c:2391: Test failed: Expected (0,0)-(512,384), got (… [View More]

1 0

Re: dxgi/tests: Some spelling fixes in ok() messages.
by Marvin 07 Jan '17

07 Jan '17

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=27612 Your paranoid android. === w7pro64 (32 bit device) === device.c:1445: Test failed: SetFullscreenState failed, hr 0x887a0004.

1 0

Re: [PATCH] d3dx11: Remove forward to d3dx11_43.
by Matteo Bruni 06 Jan '17

06 Jan '17

2016-12-29 16:59 GMT+01:00 Andrey Gusev <andrey.goosev(a)gmail.com>: > Signed-off-by: Andrey Gusev <andrey.goosev(a)gmail.com> > --- > dlls/d3dx11_42/d3dx11_42.spec | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/dlls/d3dx11_42/d3dx11_42.spec b/dlls/d3dx11_42/d3dx11_42.spec > index f97ec24..0a6350c 100644 > --- a/dlls/d3dx11_42/d3dx11_42.spec > +++ b/dlls/d3dx11_42/d3dx11_42.spec > @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ > @ stub … [View More]

1 0

Re: [PATCH] d3dx11: Add D3DX11CreateShaderResourceViewFromMemory stub.
by Matteo Bruni 06 Jan '17

06 Jan '17

2016-12-28 15:43 GMT+01:00 Andrey Gusev <andrey.goosev(a)gmail.com>: It's probably pretty safe but I'd prefer to defer this patch after 2.0.

1 0

Re: [PATCH 1/4] ddraw: Don't write out if a ddraw1 surface of size 0 is requested.
by Henri Verbeet 06 Jan '17

06 Jan '17

On 6 January 2017 at 08:07, Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Fixes https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42159 > This isn't a regression, right? > @@ -2975,10 +2975,7 @@ static HRESULT WINAPI ddraw1_CreateSurface(IDirectDraw *iface, > hr = ddraw_surface_create(ddraw, &surface_desc2, &impl, outer_unknown, 1); > wined3d_mutex_unlock(); > if (FAILED(hr)) > - { > - *surface = NULL; > return hr; > - } … [View More]

2 2

Re: [PATCH] user.exe16: Add missing SELECTOROF in WM_DDE_EXECUTE.
by Alexandre Julliard 06 Jan '17

06 Jan '17

Zebediah Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> writes: > Signed-off-by: Zebediah Figura <z.figura12(a)gmail.com> > --- > dlls/user.exe16/message.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/dlls/user.exe16/message.c b/dlls/user.exe16/message.c > index 7bcc8e2..383d746 100644 > --- a/dlls/user.exe16/message.c > +++ b/dlls/user.exe16/message.c > @@ -900,7 +900,7 @@ LRESULT WINPROC_CallProc16To32A( winproc_callback_t callback, … [View More]

2 2

Re: [PATCH 1/4] ddraw: Don't write out if a ddraw1 surface of size 0 is requested.
by Alex Henrie 06 Jan '17

06 Jan '17

2017-01-06 0:07 GMT-07:00 Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24(a)gmail.com>: > Fixes https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42159 > > With this patch, Sega Bug shows its intro logos, although it crashes > with "Unhandled privileged instruction" immediately after that. In case anyone is curious, I got rid of the "Unhandled privileged instruction" error by modifying my ioperm wrapper described at https://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2016-September/114873.html to open ports 3D0-… [View More]

1 0

Re: [PATCH 4/4] ddraw: Don't write out if a ddraw7 surface of size 0 is requested.
by Marvin 06 Jan '17

06 Jan '17

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=27599 Your paranoid android. === w1064 (32 bit ddraw7) === ddraw7.c:2276: Test failed: Expected (0,0)-(512,384), got (0,0)-(1024,768). === w1064 (64 bit ddraw7) === ddraw7.c:2276: Test failed: Expected (0,0)-(512,384), got (0,0)-(1024,768).

1 0

Re: [PATCH 3/4] ddraw: Don't write out if a ddraw4 surface of size 0 is requested.
by Marvin 06 Jan '17

06 Jan '17

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=27598 Your paranoid android. === w1064 (32 bit ddraw4) === ddraw4.c:2550: Test failed: Expected (0,0)-(512,384), got (0,0)-(1024,768). === w1064 (64 bit ddraw4) === ddraw4.c:2550: Test failed: Expected (0,0)-(512,384), got (0,0)-(1024,768).

1 0

Re: [PATCH 2/4] ddraw: Don't write out if a ddraw2 surface of size 0 is requested.
by Marvin 06 Jan '17

06 Jan '17

Hi, While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=27597 Your paranoid android. === w1064 (32 bit ddraw2) === ddraw2.c:2395: Test failed: Expected (0,0)-(512,384), got (0,0)-(1024,768). === w1064 (64 bit ddraw2) === ddraw2.c:2395: Test failed: Expected (0,0)-(512,384), got (0,0)-(1024,768).

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-devel January 2017