wine-devel

wine-devel@winehq.org

10 participants
84459 discussions

Fwd: Re:SpecOpS Labs
by Ivan Leo Murray-Smith 27 Apr '04

27 Apr '04

I asked project davied if they know what use of LGPL code involves, and if the're using wine code, I got the following answer. The impression I have is that they are using major parts of wine. They claim they will fully comply with the LGPL. Here is the full email they sent me. > Good Evening Mr. Smith > > > Thanks for your email; We appreciate your taking the time to delve into > Project David. We feel certain that the closer that you look at the project > the more comfortable you will be with it. > > Our overall purpose of the project is to encourage consumers to use Linux. > Our David Linux/Win Bridge software is simply a product to facilitate the > transition to Linux. Our Linux/Win Bridge software is one of multiple > components, which comprise our OS platform. In the future we will release > another component, which is a set of tools that will encourage developers to > write native Linux applications. > > The David software is a joint development effort between De La Salle > University and SpecOpS Labs. Our Chief Technical Officer is Mr. Peter > Valdez. As you may know Mr. Valdez is the founder of Tivoli Systems, which > is now a multi billion-dollar flagship product of IBM. > > The code for our Windows/Linux Bridge is a hybrid of code, including our own > proprietary code, and code from several open source projects. For now we > are keeping the exact nature of our code under wraps until our first release > of David. We are not using pirated or stolen code from Microsoft or any > other source. As stated we are not disclosing the nature of our code or our > exact methodology for running Windows Apps on Linux, this is for competitive > and other reasons. However, a good deal of our success is attributed to our > innovative methodology in assembling together open source code, proprietary > code that we have written/purchased, and freeware. In the future, once we > disclose how we have done this, then Im sure a number of developers will be > kicking themselves in the rear end for not having thought of this > themselves. > > We do encourage the open source movement and we will comply with the GNU > LESSER GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE. > > Our website is currently under construction, the data (*especially the > technical data) on the website for the most part is not current and in some > cases is up to 20+ months old. We are now in the process of doing a major > overhaul of the site, which we expect to be completed in a few weeks. *The > technical data on our web site concerning David, is outdated and in some > cases a competitive smoke screen. We appreciate your comments on the WINE > Project and we have no intention of misrepresenting the WINE. Therefore, we > are now consulting our English-technical writers and the Filipino - > designers/developers of David to ensure that there are no mistakes in the > translation. Until we can update the website we have disabled the links to > both our technical and competitive data. Hopefully, the development > community wont get wrapped around the axle about David, and will withhold > judgment until David is released. > > So far as our product goes we just completed our prototype, which has been > in the making for quite some time. Our first release will be issued before > the end of 2004; we expect to start Beta Testing in about 4-5 months. On 22 > April we held a press conference at De La Salle University. During the press > conference we demonstrated our prototype to more than 30 members of the > local and international media. During the demo we ran Macromedia Flash, and > MS Office on our Windows/Linux Bridge without a hitch. What you read in the > media was primarily the result of the press conference/demo. David is not a > hoax or vaporware, but we're not going to make any further claims about > David at this point, We prefer to let our software do our talking for us. > > > FYI: We are now a publicly traded company, our ticker symbol is SPLMF, you > can view it on any major financial website such as Merrill Lynch: > http://askmerrill.ml.com/markets_chart/1,2260,,00.html?q=SPLMF > > > > Thanks > > > > > Customer Service > SpecOpS Labs > Summit One Office Tower > Unit 23-H, 530 Shaw Blvd > Mandaluyong City, Metro Manila, Philippines > > Office 63 2 532-7854 > Fax 63 2 532-5875 >

7 10

winealsa fails the winmm test
by Francois Gouget 27 Apr '04

27 Apr '04

I'm not having much luck with sound this week-end :-( First there was the crash in ALSA_WaveInit() (an old bug apparently), but now the winmm test either gets stuck or crashes. When it gets stuck it's because I get: trace:wave:wodUpdatePlayedTotal dwPlayedTotal=21987 dwWrittenTotal=22050 delay=63 trace:wave:wodPlayer_NotifyCompletions still playing 0x4069fd1c (22050/21987) trace:wave:wodPlayer waiting 2ms (7,2) trace:wave:wodUpdatePlayedTotal dwPlayedTotal=21987 dwWrittenTotal=22050 delay=63 ... So the problem is that everything has been played but because snd_pcm_delay() keeps returning 63, dwPlayedTotal never reaches the 22050 that would signal the completion of the first tone. Now it seems like snd_pcm_delay() should return 0 after a while so this looks like an Alsa bug (0.9.6). Is this a known bug? Is there a way to work around it? (besides commenting out the call to snd_pcm_delay()) And when I don't get into the above infinite loop it's because I've crashed before with an Alsa assertion: trace:wave:wodPlayer waiting 7ms (7,4294967295) trace:wave:wodUpdatePlayedTotal dwPlayedTotal=11781 dwWrittenTotal=17184 delay=5403 trace:wave:wodPlayer_WriteMaxFrags Writing wavehdr 0x4069fd1c.17184[22050] trace:wave:wodPlayer_WriteMaxFrags 1065 dwLength=2433 toWrite=110 0010:Call ntdll.RtlAcquireResourceShared(4037c168,00000001) ret=404e0751 0010:Ret ntdll.RtlAcquireResourceShared() retval=00000001 ret=404e0751 0010:Call ntdll.RtlReleaseResource(4037c168) ret=404e08ae 0010:Ret ntdll.RtlReleaseResource() retval=00000000 ret=404e08ae 0010:Call ntdll.RtlTryEnterCriticalSection(40340098) ret=404e0519 0010:Ret ntdll.RtlTryEnterCriticalSection() retval=00000001 ret=404e0519 0010:Call ntdll.RtlTryEnterCriticalSection(40340098) ret=404e0519 0010:Ret ntdll.RtlTryEnterCriticalSection() retval=00000001 ret=404e0519 0010:Call ntdll.RtlTryEnterCriticalSection(40340098) ret=404e0519 0010:Ret ntdll.RtlTryEnterCriticalSection() retval=00000001 ret=404e0519 wine-kthread: pcm.c:5899: snd_pcm_mmap_commit: Assertion `frames <= snd_pcm_mmap_avail(pcm)' failed. The interesting things are that wwo->write points to snd_pcm_mmap_writei(). This assertion would seem to imply that we are writing too much stuff at once? -- Francois Gouget fgouget(a)free.fr http://fgouget.free.fr/ The greatest programming project of all took six days; on the seventh day the programmer rested. We've been trying to debug the *&^%$#@ thing ever since. Moral: design before you implement.

2 1

2 Fatal Problems With Winesetuptk-0.73 (BOTH Sourceforge Release Formats)
by Kenny Love 27 Apr '04

27 Apr '04

In the Bugzilla system, including the search page, there is no mention of Winesetuptk, so I can't tell whether the following bugs are new to you. These two problems are of considerable import to aspiring Wine users, particularly if they are running Red Hat Linux 6.2 or equivalent or older (for the first item, Red Hat Linux 7.x or equivalent might also be affected). 1. The rpm'ed Winesetuptk binary currently posted on the Sourceforge site, winesetuptk-0-73.i586.rpm, aborts on startup on a Red Hat Linux 6.2 system with the message "winesetuptk: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.3' not found (required by winesetuptk)". I suspect this means that the binary (maybe the Tcl/Tk/ITcl) is dynamically linked to glibc 2.3, but Red Hat Linux 6.2 can only be easily upgraded to glibc 2.1.3-21; even Red Hat Linux 7.3 easily upgrades only to glibc 2.2.5-44, so this might prohibit most Red Hat Linux installations older than 8.0 from running this binary. 2. The scripts in the Winesetuptk tarball currently posted on the Sourceforge site, /winesetuptk-0-73.tar.bz2, hang. When run "as scripts directly" on a Red Hat Linux 6.2 system with Tcl 8.0.5-35 and ITcl 3.0.1-35 installed, after the program opens a window stating "Autodetection in Progress", an error notice appears stating that map is not a legal argument to the string function ("Error: bad option "map": must be compare, first, index,"...). After the notice's "Ok" button is pressed, the error notice box disappears, but the program quietly hangs, ignoring attempts to close the remaining windows. Bash's kill command, probably unknown to the novice, is required to exit the comatose program. Also, on the launching shell window appears the message "CBase::AutoConf:GetWinInstalls: unable to grep /dos/c/msdos.sys: child process exited abnormally ". My /dos/c/ directory contains my dual-boot Windows 3.1 system. In the tcl8.3.2 subdirectory, the "changes" file lists, between the "8.1 final" and "8.1.1" headers, a "new features" entry dated 5/3/99 mentioning adding Jeff Hobbs' patches introducing, among others, a map argument to the string function. The Sourceforge Winesetuptk-0.73 release note states that at version 0.34b, all was successfully converted from requiring Tcl 8.4 to using Tcl 8.0, so this map call appears to be a small overlooked mouse with a show-stopping roar. I lack Tcl programming experience, but the stack trace (see below) and 'grep'-ing the source tree for potential "string_ map" calls seems to implicate "winesetuptk-0.73/Enable8.0Compatibility.tcl", line 42 as the culprit; it looks like there's no if-clause to handle $aCmd == "map". Here's the stack trace: bad option "map": must be compare, first, index, last, length, match, range, tolower, toupper, trim, trimleft, trimright, wordend, or wordstart while executing "string_ map {{${WinDir}} windows} {${WinDir}/system}" ("eval" body line 1) invoked from within "eval string_ $aCmd [list $aStr] $args" (procedure "string" line 26) invoked from within "string map [list {${WinDir}} $WinDir] $SystemDir" (object "::ObjBase" method "::CBase::AutoConf:GetWinInstalls" body line 74) invoked from within "AutoConf:GetWinInstalls $Drives" (object "::ObjBase" method "::CBase::AutoConf" body line 39) invoked from within "$pObjBase AutoConf" ("GEN_NEW" arm line 6) invoked from within "switch [$pObjBase AccessCfgData GET_KEY_VALUE_BY_NAME Cfg WhatToDo] { GEN_NEW { CMsgDialog ObjWaitMsg . .wait_msg "WineSetup" "Autodetection..." (object "::ObjScrFileLoc" method "::CScrFileLoc::SetWineData" body line 2) invoked from within "SetWineData" (object "::ObjScrFileLoc" method "::CScrFileLoc::SetResult" body line 58) invoked from within "::ObjScrFileLoc SetResult NEXT" (in namespace inscope "::CBaseScr" script line 1) invoked from within "namespace inscope ::CBaseScr {::ObjScrFileLoc SetResult NEXT}" invoked from within ".f_scr.b_next invoke" ("uplevel" body line 1) invoked from within "uplevel #0 [list $w invoke]" (procedure "tkButtonUp" line 8) invoked from within "tkButtonUp .f_scr.b_next" (command bound to event) I'm going to try compiling the Winesetuptk-0.73 source from the tarball on my system; hopefully that will produce a >working< binary dynamically linked to glibc 2.1.3-21. Considering that most aspiring Wine users, (Remember: Many, perhaps most of those are new to Linux itself.), are currently steered by the Wine documentation to use the Winesetuptk program with its nice, friendly GUI, those who took the time-honored route of putting a Linux installation from second-hand CD's on an older, expendable PC (which often limits one to a 6.2/7.0 version or less because 2.4 kernels can thrash too much on old hardware to be useful) may be in for a big suprise when they try to graphically configure their wine.conf file. To summarize, the rpm binary release as-is probably won't start for Linux versions older than Red Hat Linux 8.0 or equivalent and the tarball release as-is hangs deviously when run "as scripts directly" on systems with Tcl 8.0, possibly 8.1.0. By the way, that rpm should have refused to install because the program required a higher version glibc than my Linux system possesses, shouldn't it? Thanks! Kenny A life spent making mistakes is not only more honorable, but more useful than a life spent doing nothing. G. B. Shaw

1 0

Alignment testing
by Hans Leidekker 27 Apr '04

27 Apr '04

Hi, kernel/tests/generated.c currently shows one failure when the executable is compiled with MinGW. Investigation shows that MinGW and GCC differ when it comes to alignment of doubles (i.e. a 64 bit wide type). I have constructed the test below that shows the difference between MinGW and GCC. My question is, could someone compile this with MSVC >= 6, run it, and report the outcome here? Thanks, -Hans

3 4

GetDriveTypeW crash
by Robert Reif 27 Apr '04

27 Apr '04

I'm having problems with several programs crashing in GetDriveTypeW. I recently did a fresh install from source with tools/wineinstall so it may be a config problem. Any ideas where to start? Unhandled exception: page fault on read access to 0x00000000 in 32-bit code (0x404944b0). In 32-bit mode. 0x404944b0 (GetDriveTypeW+0xac [volume.c:110] in KERNEL32.DLL): movw 0x0(%edi),%ax 111 { Wine-dbg>bt Backtrace: =>0 0x404944b0 (GetDriveTypeW+0xac(root=0x0) [volume.c:110] in KERNEL32.DLL) (ebp=4081e8b8) 1 0x40493294 (GetVolumeInformationW+0x300(root=0x0, label=0x0, label_len=0x0, serial=0x0, filename_len=0x4081fb34, flags=0x4081fb38, fsname=0x0, fsname_len=0x0) [volume.c:683] in KERNEL32.DLL) (ebp=4081f7b8) 2 0x40493551 (GetVolumeInformationA+0x91(root=0x0, label=0x0, label_len=0x0, serial=0x0, filename_len=0x4081fb34, flags=0x4081fb38, fsname=0x0, fsname_len=0x0) [volume.c:780] in KERNEL32.DLL) (ebp=4081f7fc) 3 0x01004012 (PPView97.exe..text+0x3012 in PPView97.exe) (ebp=4081fb48) 4 0x01004c0c (PPView97.exe..text+0x3c0c in PPView97.exe) (ebp=4081fc8c) 5 0x0100577f (PPView97.exe..text+0x477f in PPView97.exe) (ebp=4081fdb0) 6 0x01005970 (PPView97.exe..text+0x4970 in PPView97.exe) (ebp=4081fec4) 7 0x01005aa8 (PPView97.exe..text+0x4aa8 in PPView97.exe) (ebp=4081ff2c) 8 0x404773ca (start_process+0xf2(arg=0x0) [process.c:785] in KERNEL32.DLL) (ebp=4081fff4) 9 0x4002921d (wine_switch_to_stack+0x11 in libwine.so.1) (ebp=00000000)

2 1

Re: Make dlls-kernel-tests-file.c work on Windows 95 and XP.
by Alexandre Julliard 27 Apr '04

27 Apr '04

Jakob Eriksson <jakov(a)vmlinux.org> writes: > +static int test_win9x_based() > +{ > + OSVERSIONINFOEX ver; > + > + ver.dwOSVersionInfoSize = sizeof(OSVERSIONINFO); > + ok( GetVersionEx ((OSVERSIONINFO *) &ver), " --- Can't get OS version.\n" ); > + if ((4 == ver.dwMajorVersion && 0 == ver.dwMinorVersion && 1381 == ver.dwBuildNumber) > + || ver.dwMajorVersion >= 5) > + { > + return 0; > + } > + > + return 1; You should not do version checks in tests, the checks should be based on the features we are testing. Otherwise the results are going to depend on the Windows version that Wine is configured for, which is the wrong thing to do since the behavior of the Wine code in that case does not depend on the version. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

2 3

Hmm.. something strange in winetest reporting
by Jakob Eriksson 26 Apr '04

26 Apr '04

Check out http://test.winehq.org/data/20040425-1000/ OSR2 shell32:string. It says "0", but if you click, there seems to be some kind of error. Is it the test output somehow erratic, or is the log parser doing something bad? regards, Jakob

2 1

Re: msvcrt: compatibility fixes
by Alexandre Julliard 26 Apr '04

26 Apr '04

"Dimitrie O. Paun" <dpaun(a)rogers.com> writes: > ChangeLog > Fix the _WCHAR_T_DEFINED/_WCHAR_T_DEFINED sentries for > compatibility with the MSVCRT ones. Unfortunately _WCHAR_T_DEFINED is also used by gcc in stddef.h. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.org

2 3

Re: String constification
by Dmitry Timoshkov 26 Apr '04

26 Apr '04

"Francois Gouget" <fgouget(a)free.fr> wrote: > We find the same issues with an added twist: now that we can use > literals we can write things like: > > const char* str = "String literal"; > > However this is slightly different from: > > static const char* str[] = "String literal"; > > The difference is that in the first case sizeof(str) returns 4 (on 32 > bit machines<g>) while in the latter we get 15. Some of our code relies > on this so care must be taken when converting the latter to the former. My understanding of this is that in the first case you declare a const pointer and hope that a compiler is smart enough to place a pointed by it object into a read only section, while in the second case you explicitly say to a compiler to place the whole object into a read only section. I prefer to not rely on a compiler's good will. -- Dmitry.

4 5

Re: RPCRT4: make the on-wire protocol Windows compatible
by Steven Edwards 26 Apr '04

26 Apr '04

Hiya Filip, You should leave this part out. I dont think Alexandre will remove it for you. +#ifndef __REACTOS__ __TRY { - if (func) func(&msg); + if (func) func(msg); } __EXCEPT(rpc_filter) { /* failure packet was created in rpc_filter */ } __ENDTRY +#else + if (func) func(msg); +#endif Thanks Steven __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Photos: High-quality 4x6 digital prints for 25� http://photos.yahoo.com/ph/print_splash

1 0

Re: Remove debugmsg from guides
by Ivan Leo Murray-Smith 26 Apr '04

26 Apr '04

> Please don't do that, we've been over this a thousand times, > let's not rehash it. Do either or, otherwise you end up > confusing Alexandre's script, etc. Inlining is prefered > for a lot of reasons, so if you're using a decent mail client > (and you seem to be), just inline it and don't look back :) I'm not using an email client, my ESP only allows that if I connect via their dial-up service. That's why I can't have text/plain attachments. Ivan.

1 0

Re: Remove debugmsg from guides
by Dimitrie O. Paun 26 Apr '04

26 Apr '04

On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, Ivan Leo Murray-Smith wrote: > attaching as text/plain can't be done for various reasons, so I'll both attach > and inline. Please don't do that, we've been over this a thousand times, let's not rehash it. Do either or, otherwise you end up confusing Alexandre's script, etc. Inlining is prefered for a lot of reasons, so if you're using a decent mail client (and you seem to be), just inline it and don't look back :) -- Dimi.

1 0

Re: RFH: RPC patch
by Ivan Leo Murray-Smith 26 Apr '04

26 Apr '04

Running server and client with wine CVS current returns Hello Implicit RPC World! but I can't test with your patch because it doesn't cleanly apply against the current CVS code. Ivan.

1 0

service.cgi: script generation
by Dimitrie O. Paun 26 Apr '04

26 Apr '04

Currenly we send a script to run and execute all published versions that we have. This is currently problematic, because an error in one causes the abort the entire script. Moreover, releases may no arrive at the server at the same time, and if we're going to receive the poll event in between them, we'll miss some of them. What we need to do is to ask the client to execute one thing at a time. Problem is that we need to keep track of what the client did execute already. Here's a way to do it without storing state on the server side, which is problematic. We need to introduce three new cookies: build_id: the current build ID that we execute. It's going to be something like '200405031000' current: the name of the test that was just executed history: a comma separated list of filenames that where already executed by the client for this current build. It's going to look like so: 'wine-200405031000-paul-mingw.zip,wine-200405031000-kevin-mingw.zip' The algorithm is simple: if $build_id != $current_build_id $build_id = $current_build_id $history = "" else $history = $history . "," . $current $current = pick_next_test($history) # send script to run $current, and to set the values of the # three cookies to the values in our variables where: pick_next_test picks the next test to run from the pool of tests avaiable for our current build, so that it doesn't appear in $history Comments? -- Dimi.

1 0

Re: Font selection - please review
by Shachar Shemesh 26 Apr '04

26 Apr '04

Hi Dirk, First of all, thank you for the reference. Regarding the missing flag to TranslateCharsetInfo - My VisualStudio 6 MSDN DVD (Latest that came up for that version - dated October 2001) does not have this flag mentioned. This means either that the flag was not present at that time, or that it was present but they forgot to mention it (has happened to me before). The latest MSDN (http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/intl/unico…) does mention it, and claims it's available on Windows 2000 (like you said). I guess this is anyone's guess what this means as far as when you can use it. Fortunetly for Wine, we don't care when it was introduced. If Wine has it, we can use it. At least for code written by us, that rule is fine. So, thank you very much for the good advice. Are you a wine user that needs this flag, or did you just happen to see my email when you were investigating a Win32 problem? Shachar Dirk Luetjens wrote: > Hello Shachar Shemesh, > > sorry for the lost context. Your mail I replyed to, is available at > > http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-patches/2002/11/0221.html > > I know, that the wine project is totally unrelated to any windows dll. > I thought it would be better to mention, that this additonal flag for > TranslateCharsetInfo is not available in a specific windows version, > since the wine project tries to implement the WIN32 interface, and it > should behave as close as possible to the original one. Judging from > the code in > > http://source.winehq.org/source/objects/font.c#L1849 > > this additional flag is not yet implemented in wine. I can not tell > you when it was introduced into WIN32 itself. The MSDN says something > about WIN2000, but it isn't available on my WIN2k installation. > > Dirk > > > Shachar Shemesh wrote: > >> Hi Dirk, >> >> Judging from the email address you used to send me this email, we are >> talking about a fairly old post. Can you please direct me to the some >> context regarding what was my post exactly? A link with the post in >> question would be very helpful. >> >> Also, I hope you do realize that my post was on a Wine mailing list, >> which means that the functions there are totally disjointed from any >> particular Microsoft version or DLL. >> >> Many thanks, >> Shachar >> >> Dirk Luetjens wrote: >> >>> Hi Shachar Shemesh, >>> >>> I came across your post while researching a problem I had during >>> application development under windows. >>> >>> While digging in the MSDN I found another function that deals with >>> this problem: TranslateCharsetInfo >>> >>> --- >>> TranslateCharsetInfo function translates based on the specified >>> character set, code page, or font signature value, setting all >>> members of the destination structure to appropriate values. >>> --- >>> >>> and for the flag parameter: >>> >>> --- >>> TCI_SRCLOCALE Windows 2000: Source (that is, lpSrc) is the LCID or >>> LANGID of the keyboard layout. If it is a LANGID, the value is in >>> the low word. >>> --- >>> >>> The destination of the translation is a CHARSETINFO structure, where >>> one entry is the charset. >>> >>> I had problems using this parameter, since it isn't implemented in >>> the gdi version I use (VS6, gdi32.dll 5.00.2195.6898). I can only >>> find the definition in the newer .NET studio headers. But perhaps >>> this is a possible inclusion point for your function. >>> >>> Best regards >>> Dirk Luetjens >>> >> >> > > -- Shachar Shemesh Lingnu Open Source Consulting http://www.lingnu.com/

1 0

Re: winmm wave test
by Robert Reif 26 Apr '04

26 Apr '04

Francois Gouget wrote: > Some Windows sound drivers allow wild frequencies such as the 2MHz > one. > Is this a windows driver bug? Is the test really valid and it's just finding a real bug in the windows driver for that specific sound card? I know it makes the test fail on bad windows drivers but is that bad?

2 4

email add
by kosta 26 Apr '04

26 Apr '04

1 0

Re: Add some functions to msvcrt.dll
by Dmitry Timoshkov 26 Apr '04

26 Apr '04

"kata 198" <kata198(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > Changelog: > Add some functions to msvcrt.dll If you could make your patch behave according to current locale that would be really nice. Otherwise it's not acceptable. Also, please make sure that your formatting style is at least consistent, and even better conforms to the formatting style of the file you are editing. -- Dmitry.

1 0

RFH: MDI Window menu fix
by Krzysztof Foltman 25 Apr '04

25 Apr '04

I've just finished fixing the behaviour of Window menu in MDI applications. However, I'm not sure if it won't cause some other MDI applications to work incorrectly. So, if you have some time and MDI apps to play with (regardless if they worked correctly before or not), check this out and tell me if I've fixed or broken the Window menu. http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-patches/2004/04/0414.html Krzysztof

1 0

Re: abnt2 keyboard patch
by Mauro Carvalho Chehab 25 Apr '04

25 Apr '04

Rafael, With your patch, the '\' key on the main keyboard will stop to work on the ABNT2 Keyboard, at least on the ABNT2 keyboards I've tested (some low valued keyboards and also Compaq keyboard). On ABNT2 keyboards, before the 'z' key there is the '\' key and the layout has to reflect that. That was the situation before 200303xx version. That changes was required in order to support that key. Had you tested it? If it works on your keyboard, may be you has some ABNT2 variant. I think it would be better to find another solution for the numeric keyboard that doesn't break the main keyboard. Mauro Chehab > Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 10:52:01 -0300 > From: Rafael Ávila de Espíndola <rafael.espindola(a)ic.unicamp.br> > To: wine-devel(a)winehq.org > Subject: Re: abnt2 keyboard patch > > > That's why I said that it's an X11 bug and we can do nothing about it. > > > > Please resubmit the patch without that part. > Attached. I will contact xfree and try to fix the rest of the problem. > > Thanks. > > > Dmitry. > Rafael >

2 1

RFH: RPC patch
by Filip Navara 25 Apr '04

25 Apr '04

Hi, for about week and half I was working on a patch that makes Wine RPC runtime communicating with the Windows one. Now I'm almost done with the work and I need help from someone who can test the patch under Wine. (I was doing all my testing under regular Windows.) If someone will be willing to help me testing it, the patch is at www.volny.cz/xnavara/rpc/ along with a test programs. Regards, Filip

1 0

Wine bug with MFC/C++?
by greensh＠knology.net 25 Apr '04

25 Apr '04

It appears that Wine cannot use tmpfs... so far my testing only works using swap :o( which I do have enabled at home and it crashes. At work I have a 500MB swap space and the same exact program does not crash there. It's not convenient for me to run swap at home, so does anyone know a fix for this? The code seems to require approx 500MB free memory. Since I only have 500MB RAM, I setup tmpfs on /tmp. But wine doesn't seem to use any of it. Shaun

1 0

winetest.exe output from Windows 95
by Jakob Eriksson 25 Apr '04

25 Apr '04

By killing processes left and right, I managed to get a 50 - megabyte log. Maybe in the future we should link in bzip2 in winetest.exe to compress logs before submitting? regards, Jakob

2 2

Re: Remove debugmsg from guides
by Dimitrie O. Paun 25 Apr '04

25 Apr '04

On Sun, 25 Apr 2004, Ivan Leo Murray-Smith wrote: > Please let me know if something isn't OK. A few points: -- I find the change confusing. There's no WINEDEBUG channel. I think most should just change from debugmsg -> debug -- Please provide only one .diff file. Multiple diffs are not necessary, and makes reviewing and applying so much more difficult. -- It would be nice if the diff would be either inlined or attached as text/plain. Inlining is prefered, this way people can quote easily when replying. -- Dimi.

1 0

Re: Remove debugmsg from guides
by Eric Pouech 25 Apr '04

25 Apr '04

Ivan Leo Murray-Smith a écrit : > With this all unneeded references to debugmsg should be gone. Just one note, in > debugger.sgml I found this > [MACHINE\\Software\\Microsoft\\Windows NT\\CurrentVersion\\AeDebug] 957636538 > "Auto"=dword:00000001 > "Debugger"="winedbg --debugmsg -all %ld %ld" > As I don't know what it's meant to be now, I've left it, if it should change, > let me know. > Please let me know if something isn't OK. > > Ivan. this should be changed into "Debugger"="winedbg %ld %ld" (the issue is that the debugger will be inheriting the parent's debug channel, while this setting was turning off all debugging channels from debugger itself). A+

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-devel