wine-devel

wine-devel@winehq.org

10 participants
84459 discussions

Re: Script to compile Wine programs on Windows
by Dimitrie O. Paun 30 Sep '03

30 Sep '03

> I don't think that's a real problem, these files don't change > often. It certainly doesn't justify adding a complicated > infrastructure to deal with it. Indeed, I said, and I let it go. But thinking a little more about it, I don't see how you solve the problem with the manual stuff. As I understand it, the problem we need to solve is as follows: -- store rule in Make.rules.in -- handle multiple .rc files per Makefile -- rebuild .res file automatically if .rc or .bmp change Now, in my proposal we have: In Make.rules .rc.extract: bin2res $< && touch $@ %.res: %.rc %.extract $(WRC) -o $@ $< In make depend: bitmap1.bmp bitmap2.bmp bitmap3.bmp: rsrc.extract rsrc.res: bitmap1.bmp bitmap2.bmp bitmap3.bmp rsrc.extract: rsrc.rc The only complication here is the .extract file which allows us to split the dependencies from the rules. The complicated stuff are the dependencies, but you need those anyway. A simple marker file is a small price to pay for the convenience... If you think we can keep it simpler, can you please tell me a bit more of what you have in mind? How are we going to use that $(RCBINARIES) if we have more than one .rc file per Makefile? -- Dimi.

4 7

Re: PATCH: server/trace.c cleanup (RETRY)
by Alexandre Julliard 30 Sep '03

30 Sep '03

Gerald Pfeifer <gerald(a)pfeifer.com> writes: > [ 2nd attempt. I really don't see any viable alternative to these > casts; keeping the status quo certainly seems bad. ] That code is generated, there's no point in fixing it. You need to change tools/make_requests. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.com

2 2

RE: shlwapi 405/406
by Robert Shearman 30 Sep '03

30 Sep '03

Hi, Just a few comments on an otherwise good patch: > -static BOOL URL_JustLocation(LPCWSTR str) > +static BOOL WINAPI URL_JustLocation(LPCWSTR str) ... > -static LPCWSTR URL_ScanID(LPCWSTR start, LPDWORD size, > WINE_URL_SCAN_TYPE type) > +static LPCWSTR WINAPI URL_ScanID(LPCWSTR start, LPDWORD size, > WINE_URL_SCAN_TYPE type) Is there any reason for changing the calling convention of these two functions? > +/**************************************************************** > ********* > + * MLBuildResURLA [SHLWAPI.406] > + * > + * See MLBuildResURLA. > + */ > +HRESULT WINAPI MLBuildResURLW(LPCWSTR lpszLibName, HMODULE hMod, > DWORD dwFlags, > + LPCWSTR lpszRes, LPWSTR lpszDest, > DWORD dwDestLen) > +{ > + static const WCHAR szRes[] = { 'r','e','s',':','/','/','\0' }; > +#define szResLen (sizeof(szRes)/sizeof(WCHAR) - sizeof(WCHAR)) Should this not be #define szResLen (sizeof(szRes)/sizeof(WCHAR) - 1) ? > + HRESULT hRet = E_FAIL; > + > + TRACE("(%s,%p,0x%08lx,%s,%p,%ld)\n", debugstr_w(lpszLibName), > hMod, dwFlags, > + debugstr_w(lpszRes), lpszDest, dwDestLen); > + > + if (!lpszLibName || !hMod || hMod == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE || > !lpszRes || > + !lpszDest || (dwFlags && dwFlags != 2)) > + return E_INVALIDARG; > + > + if (dwDestLen >= szResLen + 1) > + { > + dwDestLen -= (szResLen + 1); > + memcpy(lpszDest, szRes, sizeof(lpszDest)); > + > + hMod = MLLoadLibraryW(lpszLibName, hMod, dwFlags); > + > + if (hMod) > + { > + WCHAR szBuff[MAX_PATH]; > + > + if (GetModuleFileNameW(hMod, szBuff, sizeof(szBuff)/sizeof(WCHAR))) > + { > + DWORD dwPathLen = strlenW(szBuff) + 1; > + > + if (dwDestLen >= dwPathLen) > + { > + DWORD dwResLen; > + > + dwDestLen -= dwPathLen; > + memcpy(lpszDest + szResLen, szBuff, dwPathLen * sizeof(WCHAR)); > + > + dwResLen = strlenW(lpszRes) + 1; > + if (dwDestLen >= dwResLen + 1) > + { > + lpszDest[szResLen + dwPathLen + dwResLen] = '/'; > + memcpy(lpszDest + szResLen + dwPathLen, lpszRes, > dwResLen * sizeof(WCHAR)); > + hRet = S_OK; > + } > + } > + } > + MLFreeLibrary(hMod); > + } > + } > + return hRet; > +} Rob

4 8

Re: Start menu (especially for Alexandre Julliard)
by Mike McCormack 30 Sep '03

30 Sep '03

Robert van Herk wrote: > Mike McCormack wrote: > >> Ideally, you'd want to write a Gnome VFS module that calls shell32.dll >> and queries the shell name space to generate the start menu the same >> way Windows does. You need to use some RPC mechanism to do that, as >> you can't link wine dlls directly into your gnome vfs module. > > > Oof, that sounds hard to do ;-). > > Does this mean that this module would rather be a "Windows" program (or > Wine program if you like), than a Linux programme? Because I guess that > with a Win32 program it would be easier to access shell32.dll. Although > that would not blend so well into your Linux environment I guess... > > Or maybe it is possible to write a thin Windows deamon that kinda serves > the icons and links to a Linux program? Maybe they can talk though > std/in std/out so that they could be piped together? > > Any ideas on that? What I'm talking about would be, like you say, a Windows daemon that servers the icons and pathes. The client and server would communicate with each other via a pipe or something like that. The client(s) would be a gnome vfs library, the KDE equivilent, or perhaps even plugins for other desktops. To make it easier, i guess you could just make the windows daemon enumerate the .lnk files in Windows/Start Menu first, then once you have that working, make it query the shell instead. The appropriate code from Gnome to look at is in the gnome cvs: :pserver:anonymous@anoncvs.gnome.org:/cvs/gnome the module names are: gnome-vfs gnome-vfs-extras gnome-panel I was looking at xml-rpc for the protocol to use on the pipe, but that might be a bit of an overkill, and it could be easier to write the protocol yourself. http://www.xmlrpc.com/directory/1568/implementations If you are going to use xml-rpc, make sure to choose an implementation that is LGPL compatible. Mike

2 1

RE: Wineconf 2004, otherwise known as...
by Steven Edwards 30 Sep '03

30 Sep '03

Hey Jer, I will try to be there. I can't speak for the rest of the ReactOS developers but I think we may have one or two that would like to come. I have always wanted to see the Russian Winter so I guess St. Paul in January is good practice. Thanks Steven > -----Original Message----- > From: wine-devel-admin(a)winehq.org > [mailto:wine-devel-admin@winehq.org]On > Behalf Of Jeremy White > Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 5:41 PM > To: wine-devel(a)winehq.com > Subject: Wineconf 2004, otherwise known as... > > > ...making good on my threat. > > We are making plans to host Wineconf 2004, > in St. Paul, MN, during January 2004. > > This is the last chance for someone in Europe to volunteer > to organize it in their neck of the woods... > > Otherwise, we plan to provide: > * A meeting space for 2 days > * Arrangements for moderately price hotel rooms > * Advice on transportation, which should be straightforward > * A meal or two, and drinks for at least one evening > * We'll have all CodeWeavers Wine hackers in town for the event > * Free buttons for the St. Paul Winter Carnival: > http://www.winter-carnival.com/ > <grin> > > What we will expect you to provide: > * Your airfare (sorry, no IPO money for us) > * Your hotel room > * A laptop with wireless > * Long underwear and Parkas > > What I don't know yet: > * We may need to charge some sort of modest fee, > depending on how the budget and our bank account > look. We're willing to shoulder some costs, > but we may need extra help. We'll also plan on > using the Wine party fund to help cover some costs. > * Exact dates; my thinking is to do it in conjunction > with a weekend (e.g. Fri/Sat or Sun/Mon), but > I want to see what meeting space cost/availability > looks like before I pick. Right now, Fri Jan 16th/ > Sat Jan 17th are looking good (note that LinuxWorld NY > is the following week for those that might be able > to get their employer to sponsor the trip Stateside). > > > Thoughts? Comments? > > If you think you would come, please email me privately; > I'd like to get a rough count to help with planning. > > Cheers, > > Jeremy __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com

5 5

Wineconf 2004, otherwise known as...
by Jeremy White 30 Sep '03

30 Sep '03

...making good on my threat. We are making plans to host Wineconf 2004, in St. Paul, MN, during January 2004. This is the last chance for someone in Europe to volunteer to organize it in their neck of the woods... Otherwise, we plan to provide: * A meeting space for 2 days * Arrangements for moderately price hotel rooms * Advice on transportation, which should be straightforward * A meal or two, and drinks for at least one evening * We'll have all CodeWeavers Wine hackers in town for the event * Free buttons for the St. Paul Winter Carnival: http://www.winter-carnival.com/ <grin> What we will expect you to provide: * Your airfare (sorry, no IPO money for us) * Your hotel room * A laptop with wireless * Long underwear and Parkas What I don't know yet: * We may need to charge some sort of modest fee, depending on how the budget and our bank account look. We're willing to shoulder some costs, but we may need extra help. We'll also plan on using the Wine party fund to help cover some costs. * Exact dates; my thinking is to do it in conjunction with a weekend (e.g. Fri/Sat or Sun/Mon), but I want to see what meeting space cost/availability looks like before I pick. Right now, Fri Jan 16th/ Sat Jan 17th are looking good (note that LinuxWorld NY is the following week for those that might be able to get their employer to sponsor the trip Stateside). Thoughts? Comments? If you think you would come, please email me privately; I'd like to get a rough count to help with planning. Cheers, Jeremy

9 12

[ANN] Conformance testing campaign
by Ferenc Wagner 30 Sep '03

30 Sep '03

Greetings! Hereby I ask people who have access to real Windows machines to help me gather information about the behaviour of cross- compiled conformance tests on the different platforms. Please go to http://afavant.elte.hu/~wferi/wine for details. If you can build the tests in the Wine tree by MSVC, then packaging the compiled binaries would also mean a valuable addition. You will also find a packaging script on the page. Thanks for your time, Feri.

9 39

wine & ccache
by Dimitrie O. Paun 30 Sep '03

30 Sep '03

Hi folks, Just wanted to let people know that ccache works rather well with wine. On my lowly 600MHz Pentium box, it takes about 1h to compile, after a make clean. Second time through it takes about 1/4h to do the same thing, 75% faster! (As an added bonus, CPU utilization dropped from 86% to 60%) A nice thing would be to also be able to generate a top Makefile that knows all about the project, and we no longer do the recursive descent. It takes my box almost 20 seconds to do a 'make -s' after a full build. Not sure how doable this is, but I'm sure that things would be way faster if everything would be in one big Makefile. Probably I'm just going to end up buying a faster box before this gets implemented though :) How long does it take to do a 'time make -s' after a full build on one of the beefier boxes? -- Dimi.

6 8

Start menu (especially for Alexandre Julliard)
by Robert van Herk 30 Sep '03

30 Sep '03

OK people, As I understand (from the explanation by Russell Howe (thanx:-))), there is a script called wineshelllink that is supposed to install the created start menu items in your KDE menu. First of all: this script does not seem to do anything on my installation (Slackware 9). Are there known problems with this script? Second: from looking at the script it seems that this menu is not synchronized with the actual contents of your start menu, which would seem more fancy to me. Because Windows users will be aquainted with the fact that the Start menu directory actually contains the contents of the start menu. What I would propose is a system in which the contents of the wine menu would be in continuous synchronization with your start menu. That would mean: * Less error prone coding (no need for extra scripts etc) * More forward functionality (moving in the folder will actually result in moving in the menu as well) * Better support for applications (links that are not written through api calls will actually show up as well) * Ability to copy links between Windows installation and Wine installation Wouldn't you agree such a system would be better? Grtz, Robert

2 1

Trouble installing MS SQLserver 2000 Client Tools
by Craig Davison 30 Sep '03

30 Sep '03

Hi, I've been trying to install the SQLserver Client Tools with Wine 20030911 (on Redhat 9). The setup process fails near the beginning because it cannot install MDAC ("Setup is installing Microsoft Data Access Components (MDAC) ..."). It exits with a dialog that says "Installation of the Microsoft Data Access Components package failed. (-1)". The following console messages are displayed: fixme:process:CreateProcessA (F:\standard\x86\other\sqlredis.exe,...): CREATE_SEPARATE_WOW_VDM ignored fixme:win32:PE_CreateModule Security directory ignored fixme:process:CreateProcessA (E:\IXP001.TMP\setupre.exe,...): NORMAL_PRIORITY_CLASS ignored fixme:string:MultiByteToWideChar MB_USEGLYPHCHARS not supported fixme:string:MultiByteToWideChar MB_USEGLYPHCHARS not supported fixme:string:MultiByteToWideChar MB_USEGLYPHCHARS not supported fixme:string:MultiByteToWideChar MB_USEGLYPHCHARS not supported I can't install MDAC standalone (MDAC_TYP.EXE from microsoft's website) either, but I don't think that matters because SQLserver setup will always try to install MDAC. Note that I have IE 5.5SP2 installed, and I think DCOM98 (I can't tell if that failed or succeeded) according to instructions in the WineHQ appdb. Wine is emulating "win98". Any hints? Thanks

2 1

Re: [dx82] Recode all the lights support
by MichaelGuennewig＠gmx.de 30 Sep '03

30 Sep '03

Jason Edmeades <us(a)the-edmeades.demon.co.uk> writes: > Changelog > > MaxActiveLights means number of concurrent lights, but any number can > be set up. Change support for lights into a linked list and only set > up an equivalent gl light when the light is enabled. > > Jason > > PS If this causes any regressions please let me know. I have tested it > as far as possible and havent seen anything wrong with it. When trying to playing "The Elder Scrolls III: Tribunal" version 1.4.1313 german I get now the following fixme's: fixme:d3d:IDirect3DDevice8Impl_LightEnable Light enabled requested but light not defined, so defining one! Now the cone's of the lights are visible on surfaces near a source. Looks better now, but the known issues (body texture missing, crash after a while) still persists. Michael

1 0

Re: winealsa: improve sound quality for IDsDriverImpl
by Alexandre Julliard 30 Sep '03

30 Sep '03

Jerry Jenkins <Jerry_J_Jenkins(a)hotmail.com> writes: > Based on this thought, I need a function to retrieve the buffer. Then > I found that snd_pcm_mmap_begin is the right one. But no documents > said that it is responsible for return the driver's buffer. Well, I > can verify that, and the result is really delightful for the time > being. In the long run I prefer the configure time check. I can check > that at runtime in DSDB_MMAPCopy and print some messages if the > behavior of snd_pcm_mmap_begin changes, but I can't prevent others > from accessing the buffer before DSDB_MMAPCopy check it. If the behavior is subject to change, there is no way you can test that at configure time. This needs to be a run time check. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.com

1 0

Fix for bug 640 - moving thin frames leaves mess
by Pavel Roskin 30 Sep '03

30 Sep '03

Hello! I've made a patch for http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=640 I'm sending it here because I don't 100% sure it's ready for wine-patches. But the patch fixes an important problem and I don't want it to be unnoticed. On certain versions of XFree86 (4.2.1 + Raveon 7000/VE), focus rectangles are painted in white. Also, windows with thin frames (including all popup windows) create mess when dragged, except in when managed mode. It appears that GXxor value used in graphics/x11drv/graphics.c is misinterpreted - instead of xoring the background with the pen color, the pen color is painted as is. Another xoring doesn't hide the rectangle, thus creating mess of white dotted rectangles. The radical fix would be to avoid GXxor completely, but I'm leaving it to gurus and I'm not sure if it's needed. Fortunately, there is a correct and justifiable fix on the higher level. The focus rectangle (e.g. the rectangle around active buttons) should be painted using the system text color. Xoring this color with background is wrong. Even on systems where it works, it changes the color from black to dark gray (light gray xor white), although not too much to notice it. DrawFocusRect() has been changed to use R2_COPYPEN mode. On the other hand, draw_moving_frame() should use xor, so using DrawFocusRect() is wrong there, once the later is fixed. PatBlt() with PATINVERT works just fine with buggy XFree86 and it's already used for thick frames. The patch uses a checkered brush to imitate the dotted line. The result is very close to what I see on Windows 2000 - dotted line of one pixel wide using inverted color. In fact, the frame seems to be redrawn faster and smoother than without the patch on the system without the bug. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin

5 14

Re: winealsa: improve sound quality for IDsDriverImpl
by Sylvain Petreolle 30 Sep '03

30 Sep '03

Hi Jerry, With your patch applied, I get a write access to a NULL pointer when trying to get sound with dsound (winmm tests are running ok.) Since I was using precompiled RPMs from freshrpms.net when doing the first try, I switched to 0.9.7 sources. Same result. I attached a trace from a run of wine dsound_test.exe.so dsound --debugmsg +wave,+dsound,+dsound3d Could you have a look on this ? ===== Sylvain Petreolle (spetreolle_at_users_dot_sourceforge_dot_net) ICQ #170597259 Say NO to software patents Dites NON aux brevets logiciels "What if tomorrow the War could be over ?" Morpheus, in "Reloaded". ___________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français ! Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com

2 2

Re: decompiling
by Ivan Leo Murray-Smith 29 Sep '03

29 Sep '03

OK, I won't, promise.

1 0

decompiling
by Ivan Leo Murray-Smith 29 Sep '03

29 Sep '03

Hi list, to translate the wine dlls to italian, my idea was to just get the strings from a disassembled m$ dll. Also, the text strings in wine dlls are a little different here and there respect to windows, and I was thinking that it would be a good idea to uniform them, can I do this or would it be a DMCA violation (Not that I care about the DMCA but the main cvs server is in the US)?

3 2

Updated winetests.exe
by Jakob Eriksson 29 Sep '03

29 Sep '03

winetests.exe with tests from CVS 2003-09-26 can be found here: http://vmlinux.org/~jakov/Wine/ (The bigger EXE size is due to tests generated from MSVC instead of MinGW.) This winetests.exe should not pop up various error requesters any more, so if you click past any, please note it in the comment text box. regards, Jakob

2 3

EU patent news
by Ivan Leo Murray-Smith 29 Sep '03

29 Sep '03

The anti patent petition was a success, the EU law approved on the 24th has been changed so much sine the original version that software freedom is preserved, so decss will stay legal in europe, thanks to all that signed the petition. The complete approved text can be found here http://swpat.ffii.org/papers/eubsa-swpat0202/plen0309/resu/index.en.html best parts are 3a. Member states shall ensure that data processing is not considered to be a field of technology in the sense of patent law, and that innovations in the field of data processing are not considered to be inventions in the sense of patent law. 6. The rights conferred by patents granted for inventions within the scope of this Directive shall not affect acts permitted under Articles 5 and 6 of Directive 91/250/EEC on the legal protection of computer programs by copyright, in particular under the provisions thereof in respect of decompilation and interoperability. 6a. Member States shall ensure that, wherever the use of a patented technique is needed for a significant purpose such as ensuring conversion of the conventions used in two different computer systems or networks so as to allow communication and exchange of data content between them, such use is not considered to be a patent infringement.

1 0

Re: Viruses sent from forged mail adresses ?
by Ivan Leo Murray-Smith 29 Sep '03

29 Sep '03

Yes, loads.

1 0

Re: [ros-general] RE: Wineconf 2004, otherwise known as...
by Steven Edwards 29 Sep '03

29 Sep '03

Hello Aleksey Ge and I discussed trying to attend LinuxTax in Germany. The only problem with this is that I think my wife may be due at the same time as LinuxTag!!! I would still like for us to try and do a conf in Germany though. Vizzini suggested alternating ReactOS confs in the US and EU every other year so maybe we could partner with the WINE project to do a join confernce once a year? I still would like to do St. Petersburg in Feb. We will really see how dedicated our developers are. =) Thanks Steven --- Aleksey Bragin <aleksey(a)studiocerebral.com> wrote: > If it will ever be in Germany, I will definately visit it (many > reasons, > like I'm learning Deutsch language, Deutschland is a good and > beatufil > country by what I heard from my brother who worked there, etc,etc > :)). > > > With the best regards, > Aleksey Bragin. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Thomas Weidenmueller" <info(a)w3seek.de> > To: <ros-general(a)reactos.com> > Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 9:36 PM > Subject: Re: [ros-general] RE: Wineconf 2004, otherwise known as... > > > > Aleksey Bragin wrote: > > > > >I guess some RosConf'200X should be held in Russia, and especially > during > > >winter, then :-) > > > > > >But unfortunately I don't see a lot of ReactOS-developers from > Russia > yet... > > > > > > > > >With the best regards, > > >Aleksey Bragin. > > > > > > > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > >From: "Steven Edwards" <steven_ed4153(a)yahoo.com> > > >To: <wine-devel(a)winehq.com>; <jwhite(a)codeweavers.com> > > >Cc: <ros-general(a)reactos.com> > > >Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 9:26 PM > > >Subject: [ros-general] RE: Wineconf 2004, otherwise known as... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Hey Jer, > > >>I will try to be there. I can't speak for the rest of the ReactOS > > >>developers but I think we may have one or two that would like > > >>to come. > > >> > > >>I have always wanted to see the Russian Winter so I guess > > >>St. Paul in January is good practice. > > >> > > >>Thanks > > >>Steven > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>>-----Original Message----- > > >>>From: wine-devel-admin(a)winehq.org > > >>>[mailto:wine-devel-admin@winehq.org]On > > >>>Behalf Of Jeremy White > > >>>Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 5:41 PM > > >>>To: wine-devel(a)winehq.com > > >>>Subject: Wineconf 2004, otherwise known as... > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>...making good on my threat. > > >>> > > >>>We are making plans to host Wineconf 2004, > > >>>in St. Paul, MN, during January 2004. > > >>> > > >>>This is the last chance for someone in Europe to volunteer > > >>>to organize it in their neck of the woods... > > >>> > > >>>Otherwise, we plan to provide: > > >>> * A meeting space for 2 days > > >>> * Arrangements for moderately price hotel rooms > > >>> * Advice on transportation, which should be straightforward > > >>> * A meal or two, and drinks for at least one evening > > >>> * We'll have all CodeWeavers Wine hackers in town for the > event > > >>> * Free buttons for the St. Paul Winter Carnival: > > >>> http://www.winter-carnival.com/ > > >>> <grin> > > >>> > > >>>What we will expect you to provide: > > >>> * Your airfare (sorry, no IPO money for us) > > >>> * Your hotel room > > >>> * A laptop with wireless > > >>> * Long underwear and Parkas > > >>> > > >>>What I don't know yet: > > >>> * We may need to charge some sort of modest fee, > > >>> depending on how the budget and our bank account > > >>> look. We're willing to shoulder some costs, > > >>> but we may need extra help. We'll also plan on > > >>> using the Wine party fund to help cover some costs. > > >>> * Exact dates; my thinking is to do it in conjunction > > >>> with a weekend (e.g. Fri/Sat or Sun/Mon), but > > >>> I want to see what meeting space cost/availability > > >>> looks like before I pick. Right now, Fri Jan 16th/ > > >>> Sat Jan 17th are looking good (note that LinuxWorld NY > > >>> is the following week for those that might be able > > >>> to get their employer to sponsor the trip Stateside). > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>Thoughts? Comments? > > >>> > > >>>If you think you would come, please email me privately; > > >>>I'd like to get a rough count to help with planning. > > >>> > > >>>Cheers, > > >>> > > >>>Jeremy > > >>> > > >>> > > >>__________________________________ > > >>Do you Yahoo!? > > >>The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search > > >>http://shopping.yahoo.com > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How about Germany? ;) > > > > Regards > > Thomas > > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com

1 0

Re: Get calling stack after application crash
by BiGgUn 29 Sep '03

29 Sep '03

Hi Unfortunately, when i have tried 'bt' yet. winedbg complains that there is no process loaded :( So there is no backtrace. Stephan

2 1

Viruses sent from forged mail adresses ?
by Sylvain Petreolle 29 Sep '03

29 Sep '03

Hi, I received today a mail from office-support-mailman _at_ wine.codeweavers.com, with 125k in size. Since it doesnt have an attachment, it looks strange. Did someone got the same ? ===== Sylvain Petreolle (spetreolle_at_users_dot_sourceforge_dot_net) ICQ #170597259 Say NO to software patents Dites NON aux brevets logiciels "What if tomorrow the War could be over ?" Morpheus, in "Reloaded". ___________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français ! Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com

1 0

Re: ddraw.txt and gui
by Alexandre Julliard 29 Sep '03

29 Sep '03

"Dimitrie O. Paun" <dimi(a)intelliware.ca> writes: > For the gui, I'm not sure if it would fit better somewhere > else, or if you can come up with a better name, or if we > should just merge it into a .c file (it is kinda big for > that though), or even add the message traces in the comments > for each of the functions they document (having them all > in one file is also helpful, as it gives a nice summary > about how and when these messages are sent). IMO the right place for that info is in a regression test that actually checks the message order. It should be pretty trivial to write a window procedure that takes an expected message list and checks that each successive message it receives corresponds to the next entry in that list. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.com

4 6

Re: Wineconf 2004, otherwise known as...
by Brian Vincent (C) 29 Sep '03

29 Sep '03

> Of course, now that I know Lionel is going to host this on the ski slopes, > I'm beginning to be willing to go over there...<grin> Now that would be a compelling reason to go to Europe, even if Lionel snowboards. No one has mentioned France yet as a location but it seems like a lot of you live there. I also know this ski resort in Colorado that has some pretty nice conference facilities - dedicated T1, wifi, lots of conference rooms. I think I could get a good deal on it - probably just for the cost of catering. For anyone who skis I can get cheap lift tickets. Likewise, I can get a deal on lodging, but it wouldn't be that great ($80 USD /night or so). However, I don't think Colorado is as convenient as Minneapolis and the few $$$ saved on facilities probably wouldn't justify it. The one nice thing about Minneapolis is the major airport closeby - Northwest is the major carrier there and they partner with KLM. A quick look on Travelocity shows tickets for under $600 USD (under 500 Euro?) for airfare from various European cities to Minneapolis. Despite what Jeremy says about Minneapolis, I don't think anyone from Europe will be surprised by cold temperatures. If you're used to seeing snow on the ground it's not much different.. except for the times when your eyelids freeze shut. I agree with Jeremy that having dual conferences doesn't sound as appealing. --------------- Brian Vincent Copper Mountain Telecom vincentb(a)coppercolorado.com

1 0

[jakob@vmlinux.org: Fixes to dlls/shlwapi/tests/]
by Jakob Eriksson 29 Sep '03

29 Sep '03

So, what do you think? It's not yet commited, should I start being in despair? :-) ----- Forwarded message from Jakob Eriksson <jakob(a)vmlinux.org> ----- From: Jakob Eriksson <jakob(a)vmlinux.org> To: wine-patches(a)winehq.com Subject: Fixes to dlls/shlwapi/tests/ Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 03:44:11 +0200 Fixes to dlls/shlwapi/tests/shreg.c Fixes a hang bug which appears when running shlwapi shreg test on Windows XP. Also fixes a broken test for SHCopyKey, which did not work on neither XP, NT nor Wine. Now it works on NT and XP. Plus four off-by-one fixes where NT and XP differs. regards, Jakob Index: shreg.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/wine/wine/dlls/shlwapi/tests/shreg.c,v retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -r1.13 shreg.c --- shreg.c 5 Sep 2003 23:08:30 -0000 1.13 +++ shreg.c 25 Sep 2003 01:39:31 -0000 @@ -32,9 +32,9 @@ /* Keys used for testing */ #define REG_TEST_KEY "Software\\Wine\\Test" +#define REG_SRC_KEY "Software\\Wine\\ToBeCopied" #define REG_CURRENT_VERSION "Software\\Microsoft\\Windows NT\\CurrentVersion" -static HMODULE hshlwapi; typedef DWORD (WINAPI *SHCopyKeyA_func)(HKEY,LPCSTR,HKEY,DWORD); static SHCopyKeyA_func pSHCopyKeyA; typedef DWORD (WINAPI *SHRegGetPathA_func)(HKEY,LPCSTR,LPCSTR,LPSTR,DWORD); @@ -50,35 +50,14 @@ static char * sEmptyBuffer ="0123456789"; -/* delete key and all its subkeys */ -static DWORD delete_key( HKEY hkey ) -{ - WCHAR name[MAX_PATH]; - DWORD ret; - - while (!(ret = RegEnumKeyW(hkey, 0, name, sizeof(name)))) - { - HKEY tmp; - if (!(ret = RegOpenKeyExW( hkey, name, 0, KEY_ENUMERATE_SUB_KEYS, &tmp ))) - { - ret = delete_key( tmp ); - RegCloseKey( tmp ); - } - if (ret) break; - } - if (ret != ERROR_NO_MORE_ITEMS) return ret; - RegDeleteKeyA( hkey, NULL ); - return 0; -} - -static HKEY create_test_entries(void) +static HKEY create_test_entries( const char *prefix ) { HKEY hKey; SetEnvironmentVariableA("LONGSYSTEMVAR", "bar"); SetEnvironmentVariableA("FOO", "ImARatherLongButIndeedNeededString"); - ok(!RegCreateKeyA(HKEY_CURRENT_USER, REG_TEST_KEY, &hKey), "RegCreateKeyA failed"); + ok( !RegCreateKeyA( HKEY_CURRENT_USER, prefix, &hKey ), "RegCreateKeyA failed" ); if (hKey) { @@ -170,7 +149,11 @@ */ dwSize = 6; ok(! SHQueryValueExA( hKey, "Test3", NULL, NULL, NULL, &dwSize), "SHQueryValueExA failed"); - ok( dwSize == nUsedBuffer2, "(%lu,%lu)", dwSize, nUsedBuffer2); + ok( + dwSize == nUsedBuffer2 || + (dwSize - 1) == nUsedBuffer2, /* Windows XP sp1 */ + "(%lu,%lu)" , dwSize, nUsedBuffer2 + ); /* @@ -194,7 +177,12 @@ dwRet = SHQueryValueExA( hKey, "Test3", NULL, &dwType, buf, &dwSize); ok( ERROR_MORE_DATA == dwRet, "ERROR_MORE_DATA"); ok( 0 == strcmp(sEmptyBuffer, buf), "(%s)", buf); - ok( dwSize == nUsedBuffer2, "(%lu,%lu)" , dwSize, nUsedBuffer2); + ok( + dwSize == nUsedBuffer2 || + (dwSize - 1) == nUsedBuffer2, /* Windows XP sp1 */ + "(%lu,%lu)" , dwSize, nUsedBuffer2 + ); + ok( dwType == REG_SZ, "(%lu)" , dwType); /* @@ -204,9 +192,19 @@ dwSize = sExpLen2 - 4; dwType = -1; ok( ERROR_MORE_DATA == SHQueryValueExA( hKey, "Test3", NULL, &dwType, buf, &dwSize), "Expected ERROR_MORE_DATA"); - ok( 0 == strncmp(sExpTestpath2, buf, sExpLen2 - 4 - 1), "(%s)", buf); - ok( sExpLen2 - 4 - 1 == strlen(buf), "(%s)", buf); - ok( dwSize == nUsedBuffer2, "(%lu,%lu)" , dwSize, nUsedBuffer2); + /* FIXME - what is this above test meant to do exactly? */ + ok( 0 == strlen( buf ), "(%s)", buf ); /* Windows NT 4.0 sp6 and XP sp1 do return empty strings */ + + /* Old, non working test + ok( 0 == strncmp(sExpTestpath2, buf, sExpLen2 - 4 - 1), "(%s)", buf); + ok( sExpLen2 - 4 - 1 == strlen(buf), "(%s)", buf); + */ + + ok( + dwSize == nUsedBuffer2 || + (dwSize - 1) == nUsedBuffer2, /* Windows XP sp1 */ + "(%lu,%lu)" , dwSize, nUsedBuffer2 + ); ok( dwType == REG_SZ, "(%lu)" , dwType); /* @@ -215,75 +213,104 @@ strcpy(buf, sEmptyBuffer); dwSize = 6; dwType = -1; - dwRet = SHQueryValueExA( hKey, "Test3", NULL, &dwType, NULL, &dwSize); - ok( ERROR_SUCCESS == dwRet, "(%lu)", dwRet); - ok( dwSize == nUsedBuffer2, "(%lu,%lu)" , dwSize, nUsedBuffer2); - ok( dwType == REG_SZ, "(%lu)" , dwType); + dwRet = SHQueryValueExA( hKey, "Test3", NULL, &dwType, NULL, &dwSize ); + ok( ERROR_SUCCESS == dwRet, "(%lu)", dwRet ); + + ok( + dwSize == nUsedBuffer2 || + (dwSize - 1) == nUsedBuffer2, /* Windows XP sp1 */ + "(%lu,%lu)" , dwSize, nUsedBuffer2 + ); + ok( dwType == REG_SZ, "(%lu)" , dwType ); RegCloseKey(hKey); } -static void test_SHCopyKey(void) +static void test_SHCopyKey( ) { - HKEY hKeySrc, hKeyDst; + HKEY hKeySrc; + HKEY hKeyDest; - /* Delete existing destination sub keys */ - hKeyDst = NULL; - if (!RegOpenKeyA(HKEY_CURRENT_USER, REG_TEST_KEY "\\CopyDestination", &hKeyDst) && hKeyDst) + /* Requires Internet Explorer 5.0 or later */ + if (NULL == pSHCopyKeyA) { - SHDeleteKeyA(hKeyDst, NULL); - RegCloseKey(hKeyDst); - } - hKeyDst = NULL; - if (RegCreateKeyA(HKEY_CURRENT_USER, REG_TEST_KEY "\\CopyDestination", &hKeyDst) || !hKeyDst) - { - ok(0, "didn't open dest"); - return; - } - - hKeySrc = NULL; - if (RegOpenKeyA(HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE, REG_CURRENT_VERSION, &hKeySrc) || !hKeySrc) - { - ok(0, "didn't open source"); - return; + return; } + hKeySrc = create_test_entries( REG_SRC_KEY ); - if (pSHCopyKeyA) - ok (!(*pSHCopyKeyA)(hKeyDst, NULL, hKeySrc, 0), "failed copy"); + /* Delete any existing destination key */ + SHDeleteKey( HKEY_CURRENT_USER, REG_TEST_KEY "\\CopyDestination" ); - RegCloseKey(hKeySrc); - RegCloseKey(hKeyDst); - - /* Check we copied the sub keys, i.e. AeDebug from the default wine registry */ - hKeyDst = NULL; - if (RegOpenKeyA(HKEY_CURRENT_USER, REG_TEST_KEY "\\CopyDestination\\AeDebug", &hKeyDst) || !hKeyDst) - { - ok(0, "didn't open copy"); - return; - } + hKeyDest = NULL; + ok( + ERROR_SUCCESS == + RegCreateKeyA( + HKEY_CURRENT_USER, + REG_TEST_KEY "\\CopyDestination", + &hKeyDest + ), + "did not open dest; RegCreateKeyA failed" + ); + ok( NULL != hKeyDest, "hKeyDest is NULL" ); + + ok( + ERROR_SUCCESS == (*pSHCopyKeyA)( hKeySrc, NULL, hKeyDest, 0 ), + "SHCopyKeyA failed" + ); + + + RegCloseKey( hKeySrc ); + RegCloseKey( hKeyDest ); + + + /* Check we copied the keys */ + ok( + ERROR_SUCCESS == + RegOpenKeyA( + HKEY_CURRENT_USER, + REG_TEST_KEY "\\CopyDestination", + &hKeyDest + ), + "did not open copy: RegOpenKeyA failed" + ); + ok( NULL != hKeyDest, "did not open dest; hKeyDest is NULL" ); /* And the we copied the values too */ - ok(!SHQueryValueExA(hKeyDst, "Debugger", NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL), "SHQueryValueExA failed"); + ok( + !SHQueryValueExA(hKeyDest, "Test1", NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL), + "SHQueryValueExA failed" + ); - RegCloseKey(hKeyDst); + RegCloseKey( hKeyDest ); } -START_TEST(shreg) +START_TEST( shreg ) { - HKEY hkey = create_test_entries(); - hshlwapi = GetModuleHandleA("shlwapi.dll"); - if (hshlwapi) - { - pSHCopyKeyA=(SHCopyKeyA_func)GetProcAddress(hshlwapi,"SHCopyKeyA"); - pSHRegGetPathA=(SHRegGetPathA_func)GetProcAddress(hshlwapi,"SHRegGetPathA"); - } - test_SHGetValue(); - test_SHQUeryValueEx(); - test_SHGetRegPath(); - test_SHCopyKey(); - delete_key( hkey ); + HKEY hkey; + HMODULE hshlwapi; + + hshlwapi = GetModuleHandleA( "shlwapi.dll" ); + + if (NULL == hshlwapi) + { + + return; + } + + hkey = create_test_entries( REG_TEST_KEY ); + + pSHCopyKeyA = (SHCopyKeyA_func) GetProcAddress( hshlwapi, "SHCopyKeyA" ); + pSHRegGetPathA = (SHRegGetPathA_func) GetProcAddress( hshlwapi, "SHRegGetPathA" ); + + test_SHGetValue( ); + test_SHQUeryValueEx( ); + test_SHGetRegPath( ); + test_SHCopyKey( ); + + SHDeleteKey( HKEY_CURRENT_USER, REG_TEST_KEY ); + SHDeleteKey( HKEY_CURRENT_USER, REG_SRC_KEY ); } ----- End forwarded message ----- -- regards, Jakob It's is not, it isn't ain't, and it's it's, not its, if you mean it is. If you don't, it's its. Then too, it's hers. It isn't her's. It isn't our's either. It's ours, and likewise yours and theirs. -- Oxford University Press, Edpress News

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-devel