wine-devel

wine-devel@winehq.org

9 participants
84458 discussions

wine SIGSEGV at startup
by Dimitrie O. Paun 01 Sep '03

01 Sep '03

Hi folks, For a few days now, I have a lot of problems with wine. I've managed to get it going a few days back, but I can't remember how. Now it just seg faults at startup. I just did a: [dimi@dimi wine.build]$ make -s clean [dimi@dimi wine.build]$ ../wine.src/configure --with-ntpd --silent && make -s depend && make -s [root@dimi wine.build]# make -s install but that did not fix it: [dimi@dimi dimi]$ which wine /usr/local/bin/wine [dimi@dimi dimi]$ wine Segmentation fault [dimi@dimi dimi]$ gdb wine GNU gdb Red Hat Linux (5.3post-0.20021129.18rh) Copyright 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i386-redhat-linux-gnu"... (gdb) run Starting program: /usr/local/bin/wine Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x420ebe3c in __libc_pthread_init () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (gdb) Am I the only one with this problem? -- Dimi.

5 7

msi.dll broken with yacc in current cvs
by Stefan Leichter 01 Sep '03

01 Sep '03

Hello, i can not compile msi.dll on one of my systems. make aborts with: yacc -d -t ../../../wine/dlls/msi/sql.y yacc: e - line 69 of "../../../wine/dlls/msi/sql.y", syntax error %pure-parser ^ make[2]: *** [y.tab.c] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/wine-build/dlls/msi' make[1]: *** [msi] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/wine-build/dlls' make: *** [dlls] Error 2 The second system compiles fine. It uses bison instead of yacc. Both systems are SuSE 7.3 > rpm -qa | grep -e bison -e yacc yacc-91.7.30-379 bison-1.28-127 I know i can install bison and it will compile, but i think this needs to be fixed. Bye Stefan

3 3

New EXE
by Jakob Eriksson 01 Sep '03

01 Sep '03

http://vmlinux.org/jakov/Wine/regrtest.exe Should now work on Win9x too. Works on ME at least.

6 9

Re: Bugzilla bug #556
by Dave Miller 01 Sep '03

01 Sep '03

Thanks, I hoped it would be that simple. I'll begin work on this and see if anyone yells my patches are wrong. :)

1 0

Re: New EXE
by Ivan Leo Murray-Smith 01 Sep '03

01 Sep '03

>Yes, it would be nice to have more frequent releases, but we would have >trouble labeling them...unless we stick to the build date. But in that >case, we have to have a well understood convention on what YYYYMMDD >means in terms of time, and we have to stick to it (well, the person >building this should). Any takers? What about an automatic build?

2 1

Bugzilla bug #556
by Dave Miller 31 Aug '03

31 Aug '03

Bug 556 is "reconcile the windows and wine spec files." The point I think is make sure all windows APIs are listed, and listed correctly. I have a question... If a particular API has four different ordinals in four different windows versions, what goes in the spec file? You can see an example of what I mean here: http://24.229.94.2/cgi-bin/query.cgi?version=&status=&type=&ordinal=&api=SH… If the answer is simple enough I'll start working on the bug. On a slightly related note, I relied on the wine spec files to build the apidb. I'm getting the idea now this wasn't quite the right approach, and it says some APIs are exported by wine when in fact they are not. Should I have used the .spec.def file instead? ------------------------------------- So many Right-wing Christians. So few lions.

3 2

Re: [winecfg 1.1] Implement saveConfigValue(), style changes, code cleanup, UI alignment
by Dimitrie O. Paun 31 Aug '03

31 Aug '03

On August 28, 2003 06:50 am, Mike Hearn wrote: > 2) Introduce some kind of global flag, maybe a config.h switch, maybe an > exported variable (which is best?) that controls whether the > configuration is read from the registry or config file. As patches are > submitted to make Wine read the registry as well as the config file, the > controls in winecfg would be re-enabled so people can test it. Once all > the settings have been dual-purposed in this way, we can write a bit of > migration code so people upgrading have their configurations copied into > the registry, then throw the switch. I really don't understand why we need the dual-purpose stuff. All we need to do is: -- make sure we have a GUI element for all settings in ~/.wine/config (how far are we from having this?) -- have loadConfig() initialize all these elements properly -- have saveConfig() do the saving, being a mirror image of loadConfig() (can't we unify them somehow so we have only one place to modify to add new values? [1]) -- when all this is done, just remove the code from server/registry.c:1475:init_registry() Am I missing something? [1] Maybe it's better to have a more descriptive structure detailing stuff for each value, and having generic loadConfig/saveConfig() methods that know how to walk said structure and do the right thing. This way we can easily do add all sorts of attributes to the configuration values and do all sort of nice things, like save only stuff that has been modified, automatically tie in the variable to the control, etc. -- Dimi.

7 18

Re: gethostbyname() feature.
by Jakob Eriksson 31 Aug '03

31 Aug '03

Maybe you could write a regression test for this function? Rein Klazes wrote: >hi, > >In the newsgroup someone reported a crash in gethostbyname() when the >application called it with a null parameter. > >msdn says about this: > >| If null is provided in the name parameter, the returned string is >| the same as the string returned by a successful gethostname >| function call. > >gethostbyname does not return a string, but I think this it what they >meant to say. >I have tested gethostbyname under Win2K to do this. > >Changelog: > dlls/winsock : socket.c async.c > _ws_gethostbyname() and WSAAsyncGetHostByName() when called with > a null name, should use the name returned by gethostname(). > >Rein. > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >--- wine/dlls/winsock/socket.c 2003-08-31 10:00:10.000000000 +0200 >+++ mywine/dlls/winsock/socket.c 2003-08-31 09:59:16.000000000 +0200 >@@ -2903,6 +2903,16 @@ > int ebufsize=1024; > struct hostent hostentry; > int locerr = ENOBUFS; >+#endif >+ char buf[100]; >+ if( !name) { >+ name = buf; >+ if( gethostname( buf, 100) == -1) { >+ SetLastError( WSAENOBUFS); /* appropriate ? */ >+ return retval; >+ } >+ } >+#ifdef HAVE_LINUX_GETHOSTBYNAME_R_6 > host = NULL; > extrabuf=HeapAlloc(GetProcessHeap(),0,ebufsize) ; > while(extrabuf) { >--- wine/dlls/winsock/async.c 2003-08-31 10:00:10.000000000 +0200 >+++ mywine/dlls/winsock/async.c 2003-08-31 09:47:31.000000000 +0200 >@@ -402,6 +402,16 @@ > int ebufsize=1024; > struct hostent hostentry; > int locerr = ENOBUFS; >+#endif >+ char buf[100]; >+ if( !(aq->host_name)) { >+ aq->host_name = buf; >+ if( gethostname( buf, 100) == -1) { >+ fail = WSAENOBUFS; /* appropriate ? */ >+ break; >+ } >+ } >+#ifdef HAVE_LINUX_GETHOSTBYNAME_R_6 > he = NULL; > extrabuf=HeapAlloc(GetProcessHeap(),0,ebufsize) ; > while(extrabuf) { > >

1 0

Re: wsock32: implement arp query
by Tom 31 Aug '03

31 Aug '03

Juan Lang wrote: >ChangeLog: implement arp table querying through >WsControl, and fix problem I introduced getting IP >addresses for multiple interfaces > > > Ummm..... The patch :) Tom

1 0

Re: [ANN] Conformance testing campaign
by Ivan Leo Murray-Smith 30 Aug '03

30 Aug '03

Hereby I ask people who have access to real Windows machines So vmware won't do? (I think the answer is no because of directx (Not a problem for me to do a real install, just asking)).

2 1

Re: winedos / Fix DOS exit paths
by Dimitrie O. Paun 30 Aug '03

30 Aug '03

On August 30, 2003 12:52 pm, Jukka Heinonen wrote: > The reason why I'm posting lots of small patches is that I'm currently > working on a big RMCB fix which seems to still have some minor problems What is this RMCB? Google wasn't all that helpful... -- Dimi.

2 1

LoadModule16 regression?
by Jukka Heinonen 30 Aug '03

30 Aug '03

After LoadModule16 was moved to dlls/kernel, it started to strip path from module name. This makes it impossible to execute DOS applications (and probably Win16 applications, too) unless you are in the same directory as the application. MSDN documentation on Win32 version of LoadModule states that path should not be stripped but I'm not sure how Win16 version is supposed to work. It probably uses different search order if path is not present, anyway. -- Jukka Heinonen <http://www.iki.fi/jhei/>

2 1

Bug in regrtest
by Jakob Eriksson 30 Aug '03

30 Aug '03

The tester runs on Win9X, but there is a bug that prevents it from running tests properly. I am working on it. Tested working on Windows NT so far. I will keep you posted. regards, Jakob

1 0

Re: shlobj.o
by Vincent Béron 30 Aug '03

30 Aug '03

Le sam 30/08/2003 à 08:29, Martin Fuchs a écrit : > + STDMETHOD_(ULONG, AddRef) (THIS) PURE; > + STDMETHOD_(ULONG, Release) (THIS) PURE; > + STDMETHOD (DragEnter)(THIS_ HWND hwndTarget, IDataObject* pDataObject, > POINT* ppt, DWORD dwEffect) PURE; > + STDMETHOD (DragLeave)(THIS) PURE; > + STDMETHOD (DragOver)(THIS_ POINT* ppt, DWORD dwEffect) PURE; > + STDMETHOD (Drop)(THIS_ IDataObject* pDataObject, POINT* ppt, DWORD > dwEffect) PURE; Your patch is unfortunately wrapped. shlguid.h suffers from the same problem. Vincent

2 1

listview expert required
by Eric Pouech 30 Aug '03

30 Aug '03

some apps of mine needs this to get going: can someone with good listview knowledge confirm ? (or find the correct fix) TIA -- Eric Pouech Index: dlls/comctl32/listview.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvs/cvsroot/wine/wine/dlls/comctl32/listview.c,v retrieving revision 1.357 diff -u -r1.357 listview.c --- dlls/comctl32/listview.c 24 Jul 2003 00:03:13 -0000 1.357 +++ dlls/comctl32/listview.c 22 Aug 2003 20:30:27 -0000 @@ -5822,11 +5822,11 @@ opt.x = lpht->pt.x - Position.x - Origin.x; opt.y = lpht->pt.y - Position.y - Origin.y; - if (uView == LVS_REPORT && (infoPtr->dwLvExStyle & LVS_EX_FULLROWSELECT)) + if (uView == LVS_REPORT /*&& (infoPtr->dwLvExStyle & LVS_EX_FULLROWSELECT)*/) rcBounds = rcBox; else UnionRect(&rcBounds, &rcIcon, &rcLabel); TRACE("rcBounds=%s\n", debugrect(&rcBounds)); if (!PtInRect(&rcBounds, opt)) return -1; if (PtInRect(&rcIcon, opt))

4 11

Re: [resend] Allow use of MAP_TRYFIXED for better mmap()
by Dustin Navea 30 Aug '03

30 Aug '03

as i said it was an example, but thanks for the flame --- Todd Vierling <tv(a)pobox.com> wrote: > On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Dustin Navea wrote: > > : if (running_on_netbsd && version >= > first_version_that_supports_MAP_TRYFIXED) > : #define can_use_MAP_TRYFIXED > > This damned well does not belong in any multi-OS application. I don't care > what crack Alexandre is smoking. > > -- > -- Todd Vierling <tv(a)pobox.com> ===== -- Dustin Navea Minor Contributor, http://www.winehq.com Bugzilla Janitor, http://bugs.winehq.com Network Admin, irc://irc.blynk.net (down) __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com

3 2

Re: Wine 0.9 progress
by Ivan Leo Murray-Smith 30 Aug '03

30 Aug '03

>Overkill. Wine advertises NT4 SP6 only, not the other SPs. Same thing >for each major version, only one SP match. So there's little point in >conforming to something not supported by Wine, as it's been superceded. OK, so for win9x we have 95, 98, 98se(This is a major release,I do remember finding some stuff that could run on 98se but not on 98), me (Well, anything for 9x runs on me, so wine only needs to support me to support all apps for 9x), nt4sp6(a?), xp home and pro, and 3 versions of win2k3 (Ok, I aren't counting the 64 bit for now), so it's somewhere in between 6 and 9. Whatever it is, a miling list, a database and all that other stuff isn't necessary. I can run the tests on win98se and win2k3 enterprise edition. All I have to do is get that exe that runs all the tests and outputs them to a file(Someone is half way trough writing it), and post a message to wine devel when something that did/didn't work stops/starts doing so, I can do it (Almost) every day if necessary, it doesn't seem anything difficult to me.

1 0

Re: Wine 0.9 progress
by puoti＠inwind.it 30 Aug '03

30 Aug '03

I think Francois is right, there are only about a dozen versions of windows, if you count the various win95osr1, osr2, 98se and so on, and probably the running the tests only on the major releases of windows (8 if you count xp home and pro), so all that is needed is 8 people that run these tests and send a mail to this list when something that did work breaks.

3 3

Re: [dcom 1.1] Implement dispatch variant marshalling
by Alexandre Julliard 30 Aug '03

30 Aug '03

Mike Hearn <mike(a)theoretic.com> writes: > + working_mem = GlobalAlloc(0, size); > + assert( working_mem != NULL ); > + > + hr = CreateStreamOnHGlobal(working_mem, FALSE, &working); > + assert( hr == S_OK ); > + > + hr = CoMarshalInterface(working, &IID_IDispatch, (IUnknown*)V_DISPATCH(pvar), LOWORD(*pFlags), NULL, MSHLFLAGS_NORMAL); > + assert( hr == S_OK ); Please don't use assert for error checking. Errors should be either handled properly or propagated to the caller. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.com

1 0

Re: [resend] Allow use of MAP_TRYFIXED for better mmap()
by Alexandre Julliard 29 Aug '03

29 Aug '03

Todd Vierling <tv(a)pobox.com> writes: > I've implemented the patch as forward-looking, allowing other platforms to > add MAP_TRYFIXED to gain the same benefit. (This mmap flag name does not > appear to be used in any divergent fashion on any other platform, per my > research when picking the flag's name.) If you want to keep compatibility with older kernels, you'll need to check if MAP_TRYFIXED is available at runtime, you can't test for that at compile time. Or if you don't need to maintain compatibility then you should get rid of the NetBSD ifdefs completely. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.com

7 20

Re: Wine 0.9 progress
by puoti＠inwind.it 29 Aug '03

29 Aug '03

Probably a batch script that runs all the tests and outputs the results to a file can do, but this a C program, a new mailing list, automated result submission, generating HTML and now a database for something that says: Test | Result ----------+--------- kernel32 | Passed msvcrt | Passed oleaut32 | Passed dsound | Passed seems a big exaggeration

1 0

Re: Figuring runtime settings
by puoti＠inwind.it 29 Aug '03

29 Aug '03

Maybe you're looking for this: http://appdb.winehq.com

1 0

Wine 0.9 progress
by Mike Hearn 29 Aug '03

29 Aug '03

Well, it's been a while since the last update, so I thought it'd be worthwhile to write about where we're up to. Looking at the TODO list on WineHQ, it seems the remaining work falls into two areas: * A bit of documentation stuff (rather worryingly "fix the docs build system" says a patch was submitted last *year*, but is still labelled as work in progress!). * Configuration, ie winecfg and an auto setup wizard thingy. John K Hohm has been making great progress lately with making DLLs self register, but unfortunately nobody has really stepped up to work on winecfg. We may or may not get the patches from Mark it seems :| There are a few other things, like DLL separation, and completing the work to make DLLs self register. I have a whole load of time with not much to do during September, so I might sit down and try and get some patches off for winecfg, seeing as merging in Oves OLE code is going to be slow work at my current rate of patch committing :( Is there anything else we might need? I'm tempted to say that having InstallShield work is a priority, as it seems to have broken quite a bit lately. On the TODO list it says that some window management hacks exist but more debugging work is needed - does anybody know the status of that? A lot of InstallShield installers at the moment fail due to that X11 ConfigureWindow error - how hard is this to fix? Having a wine.inf to set up a new installation, does anybody have details on that? Is this just a case of eating our own dogfood, or is it really a must have for 0.9? thanks -mike

9 18

Who says bill gates is a nice guy? (New link)
by puoti＠inwind.it 29 Aug '03

29 Aug '03

http://spazioinwind.libero.it/nonsolomicrosoft/windows.html

1 0

Who says bill gates is a nice guy?
by puoti＠inwind.it 29 Aug '03

29 Aug '03

Have a look at this photo from Redmond, inside the microsoft campus;-) http://spazioinwind.libero.it/nonsolomicrosoft/windows.jpg

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-devel