wine-devel

wine-devel@winehq.org

84471 discussions

Problem with the TEB parser
by Sylvain Petreolle 15 Sep '02

15 Sep '02

Hi list, I encounter problem with the TEB parser. Enabling the builtin olepro32 and run winedbg on a program that needs it stops with following errors hen halting on a read access to 0x0. what could I do to debug this ? First chance exception: page fault on read access to 0x00000000 in 32-bit code (0x00000000). Register dump: CS:0023 SS:002b DS:002b ES:002b FS:008f GS:04c7 EIP:00000000 ESP:405c25f0 EBP:4000b6c9 EFLAGS:00010206( R- 00 I - -P1 ) EAX:400136bc EBX:400134c0 ECX:4000bd00 EDX:400136bc ESI:00000000 EDI:00000000 Stack dump: 0x405c25f0 (NTDLL.DLL.sqrt+0x396ccc): *** Invalid address 0x405c25f0 (NTDLL.DLL.sqrt+0x396ccc) 0011: sel=008f base=4013e0c0 limit=00000fff 32-bit rw- Backtrace: =>0 0x00000000 (ebp=4000b6c9) Can't read TEB:cur_stack 0x00000000: *** Invalid address 0x00000000 -- no code -- ___________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français ! Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com

2 2

UML Merged Into 2.5.34 , VxD's
by Thomas Wickline 14 Sep '02

14 Sep '02

I see UML made it into the 2.5.34 kernel http://user-mode-linux.sourceforge.net/ From what I get VxD drivers try to get hold of your pci bus and a ton of other stuff . Could this be the start to a fix down the road when it comes to .vxd support ? Will this help when it comes to a Wine Kernel Module ? cut from there site --- User-Mode Linux gives you a virtual machine that may have more hardware and software virtual resources than your actual, physical computer. Disk storage for the virtual machine is entirely contained inside a single file on your physical machine. You can assign your virtual machine only the hardware access you want it to have. With properly limited access, nothing you do on the virtual machine can change or damage your real computer, or its software. ----- Tom

6 6

Regitry Load*RegistryFiles options oboleted?
by Raul Dias 14 Sep '02

14 Sep '02

Hi, Did the regsitry section options: LoadGlobalRegistryFiles and LoadHomeRegistryFiles got obsoleted? It is not in misc/registry.c or anywhere else in the source other than in documentation dir. When was it obsoleted? why? Regards, Raul Dias

1 1

Re: recognize Unix-style hidden files
by Alexandre Julliard 14 Sep '02

14 Sep '02

"Dimitrie O. Paun" <dpaun(a)rogers.com> writes: > The semantics associated in Unix with files starting with > a . is that they are hidden, *exactly* like the hidden DOS > files. We should mark them as such. > > We're lucky in that the DOS world does not use files that > only have extension, so we have no semantical conflict. I don't think I agree with that. Maybe in the days of 8.3 files yes, but nowadays Windows apps can create files starting with a dot, and they don't expect these files to be hidden. Also hidden files are much harder to access under Windows than dot files under Unix, so I'm not sure it would really be better for the user. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.com

5 12

Press: LinuxPlanet makes a great case for Wine
by Francois Gouget 14 Sep '02

14 Sep '02

(and reviews CrossOver Office 1.2 too :-) * August 29, 2002 - LinuxPlanet CrossOver Office: Cutting to the Quicken http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/reviews/4405/1/ -- Francois Gouget fgouget(a)free.fr http://fgouget.free.fr/ Linux: Because rebooting is for adding new hardware

1 0

Re: wine/ dlls/ntdll/Makefile.in win32/device.c me ...
by Dimitrie O. Paun 13 Sep '02

13 Sep '02

On September 13, 2002 02:52 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Log message: > Copied the registry functions needed by VMM into device.c and got rid > of memory/registry.c. Hmm, this is painful. Why and how long do we have to support Win95 advapi32? -- Dimi.

2 2

Re: Re:can windows be reparented?
by Dmitry Timoshkov 13 Sep '02

13 Sep '02

<us(a)the-edmeades.demon.co.uk> wrote: > To be honest I never investigated further once I commented out the SetParent call, > as I was continuing to fix oleaut32 and left the gui side to someone else! > > I know it was being called in the failing case, and removing it allowed the > windows to pop up, BUT they were still wrong as you could access the 'parent' > whereas you should not be able to Could you please test patch posted by Bill Medland to wine-patches today? It's not entirely correct though. My tests show that SetWindowLong(GWL_HWNDPARENT) call changes simultaneously both parent and owner for top level windows and returns old value (not sure old owner or parent it is). But top level windows created by Visual Vasic are special: they have no parent, but only owner according to Spy++. In my tests I can't reproduce it yet. A bit of investigation of Wine source revealed that some places use GetAncestor(hwnd, GA_PARENT), while others use GetParent(hwnd). Since their behaviour is different in respect of top level and child windows, some major clean up in that area in Wine is needed. -- Dmitry.

4 5

Winemaker broken?
by steve.lustbader＠philips.com 13 Sep '02

13 Sep '02

Winemaker doesn't work in the latest CVS. When I run it, it tells me: Global symbol "$app_name" requires explicit package name at /usr/local/bin/winemaker line 1674. Execution of /usr/local/bin/winemaker aborted due to compilation errors. It worked as of Sept 10. -Steve

2 2

configure and then make distclean
by Shachar Shemesh 13 Sep '02

13 Sep '02

Hi, For some strange reason (well, maybe not strange), I cannot run "make distclean" unless the make files are up to date. Is there a reason for this, or is this just a result of a check at the very begining of the makefile? It seems rather strange to me to do "./configure && make distclean; ./configure && make depend && make". Shachar P.S. No, I am not doing this every single time.

2 1

Re: Winemaker: improved MSVCRT support
by Francois Gouget 13 Sep '02

13 Sep '02

On 13 Sep 2002, Martin Wilck wrote: [...] > + if ($dllname =~ /^msvcrt\.dll$/) { You can also say 'if ($dllname eq "msvcrt.dll")'. Great work on winemaker :-) -- Francois Gouget fgouget(a)free.fr http://fgouget.free.fr/ tcA thgirypoC muinelliM latigiD eht detaloiv tsuj evah uoY

1 0

Re: Improved MoveFileEx() Patch
by Huw Davies 13 Sep '02

13 Sep '02

On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 04:50:47PM +0200, Martin Wilck wrote: > Index: files/file.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/wine/wine/files/file.c,v > retrieving revision 1.160 > diff -u -r1.160 file.c > --- files/file.c 12 Sep 2002 22:28:01 -0000 1.160 > +++ files/file.c 13 Sep 2002 14:26:47 -0000 > @@ -2579,6 +2579,7 @@ > { > DOS_FULL_NAME full_name1, full_name2; > HANDLE hFile; > + DWORD attr = INVALID_FILE_ATTRIBUTES; > > TRACE("(%s,%s,%04lx)\n", debugstr_w(fn1), debugstr_w(fn2), flag); > > @@ -2619,8 +2620,7 @@ > /* target exists, check if we may overwrite */ > if (!(flag & MOVEFILE_REPLACE_EXISTING)) > { > - /* FIXME: Use right error code */ > - SetLastError( ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED ); > + SetLastError( ERROR_FILE_EXISTS ); > return FALSE; > } > } > @@ -2647,17 +2647,17 @@ > return FILE_AddBootRenameEntry( fn1, fn2, flag ); > } > > + attr = GetFileAttributesA( full_name1.long_name ); Any reason why you don't use: attr = GetFileAttributesW( fn1 ); here? I've seen cases that I've not had time to investigate where the former version fails. Huw. -- Huw Davies huw(a)codeweavers.com

2 1

Shell icons - legal
by Jacek Bator 13 Sep '02

13 Sep '02

Hello! I realy don't like icons which are currently in shell32.dll. I've created few replacement icons from there. They are much more simillar to win95,98 icons ... but not exactly the same. I want to confirm that my work will not be wasted. ---- Original icons from Windows shell32.dll can't be inserted in wine dll because of legal issues (design or something). ----- If I'm wrong let me know. Jacek Bator jbator(a)ecommercelogic.com

1 0

WM_PAINT disappeared
by Fabian Cenedese 13 Sep '02

13 Sep '02

Hi all I have a problem with my MFC-MDI-app. There are some other windows docked in the main window. The problem now is that they don't get painted. I end up with an app-window with some areas that never get updated. I first tried with tracing but I never saw anything wrong. Now I logged in my child window (CIXDockWnd) all messages it gets. This is what happens at creation in Windows: CMainFrame::OnCreate CIXDockWnd: -WM_NCCREATE -WM_NCCALCSIZE -WM_CREATE -WM_SIZE -WM_MOVE .. (some other stuff) -WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING -WM_NCCALCSIZE -WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGED -WM_SIZE -WM_SHOWWINDOW CImdApp::InitInstance: Call ShowWindow CImdApp::InitInstance: Call UpdateWindow CIXDockWnd: -WM_PAINT (*) -WM_NCPAINT (*) CImdApp::InitInstance: Call SetFocus CIXAppFrame::OnWindowPosChanged CIXDockWnd: -WM_PAINT (*) -WM_NCPAINT (*) -WM_ERASEBKGND (*) IDLE_UPDATE Here the window is finished and visible, waiting for actions. In Wine though the paint messages of the child window (*) never show up, it stays clear. I don't know now if this is a problem in message routing (I don't think so as all other messages come through) or if these messages aren't sent at all. To investigate this can somebody point me to directions where these messages should be generated? Thanks bye Fabi

1 0

Tagging releases
by Shachar Shemesh 13 Sep '02

13 Sep '02

Hi, Would it be possible to tag each "release" announced to wine-announce in the CVS, so cvs co -r WINE_20020702 wine will actually get the wine version that corresponds to that release? I know I can do "cvs co -D 2002-jul-02 wine" for similar effect, but I don't like that solution. It has not worked well for me, and it leaves some inclarities regarding files that had several commits on the same day (not to mention time zones etc.) Shachar

2 1

Re: Fix lossage due to pathname truncation in calls to MODULE_LoadLibraryExA
by Andreas Mohr 13 Sep '02

13 Sep '02

On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 08:38:09PM +1000, Michael Beach wrote: > Recently I've been using WINE to run a Win32 exe which needs to load certain > DLLs which are located in the same directory as the exe. I was most perplexed > when I found that this worked initially, but when I moved the exe and DLLs to > a different directory it stopped working ie WINE would refuse to start the > exe, claiming that it was unable to load the required DLLs. > > After some debugging, I discovered that the critical factor was the length of > the pathname to the exe, when it passed a certain length it stopped working. > However this length was way short of the MAX_PATH value of 260. Ah, cool finding ! > static BOOL DIR_TryModulePath( LPCWSTR name, DOS_FULL_NAME *full_name, BOOL win32 ) > { > - /* FIXME: for now, GetModuleFileNameW can't return more */ > - /* than OFS_MAXPATHNAME. This may change with Win32. */ > - WCHAR bufferW[OFS_MAXPATHNAME]; > + WCHAR bufferW[MAX_PATH]; > LPWSTR p; > > if (!win32) > @@ -727,13 +725,13 @@ > if (!GetCurrentTask()) return FALSE; > if (!GetModuleFileName16( GetCurrentTask(), buffer, sizeof(buffer) )) > return FALSE; > - MultiByteToWideChar(CP_ACP, 0, buffer, -1, bufferW, OFS_MAXPATHNAME); > + MultiByteToWideChar(CP_ACP, 0, buffer, -1, bufferW, MAX_PATH); > } else { > - if (!GetModuleFileNameW( 0, bufferW, OFS_MAXPATHNAME ) ) > + if (!GetModuleFileNameW( 0, bufferW, MAX_PATH ) ) > return FALSE; > } > if (!(p = strrchrW( bufferW, '\\' ))) return FALSE; > - if (OFS_MAXPATHNAME - (++p - bufferW) <= strlenW(name)) return FALSE; > + if (MAX_PATH - (++p - bufferW) <= strlenW(name)) return FALSE; > strcpyW( p, name ); > return DOSFS_GetFullName( bufferW, TRUE, full_name ); Argl, why does this code use the buffer size contants instead of sizeof(variable) !? I suggest we always specify buffer length constants only *once*, namely at creation of the buffer. Not doing so can be potentially very harmful if we decide to change the buffer length and then manage to forget one or more length constants... Maybe you could even also fix that "weirdness" in our code ? Thanks ! :) -- The Declaration of Software Freedom: http://freedevelopers.net/freedomdec/index.php

4 8

Re: WineLib and DLLs
by steve.lustbader＠philips.com 13 Sep '02

13 Sep '02

If possible, I don't want to insert it into the wine tree, I want to leave it in the source tree of my program. Is including it in the wine tree the only way to link with it? -Steve Jon Griffiths <jon_p_griffiths To: Steven Edwards <steven_ed4153(a)yahoo.com> @yahoo.com> cc: wine-devel(a)winehq.com Sent by: (bcc: Steve Lustbader/ANR/MS/PHILIPS) wine-devel-admin Subject: Re: WineLib and DLLs @winehq.com Classification: 09/12/2002 05:58 PM Please respond to jon_p_griffiths Hi, >I'm writing a WineLib DLL that makes calls in my own Windows DLLs >(not Wine's DLLs). I have the header files for those DLLs, and the >Windows binaries for them. How do I link to them? Do I need to wrap >them in spec files? What do I need to put into my Makefile.in? look at tools/winedump. In spec mode it will generate everything you need to link to this dll - a makefile and dummy implementation, spec file and a script to insert it into your existing WINE tree (to link with). The README gives instructions for exactly this case (and some other more advanced ones). Cheers, Jon ===== "Don't wait for the seas to part, or messiahs to come; Don't you sit around and waste this chance..." - Live jon_p_griffiths(a)yahoo.com __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! News - Today's headlines http://news.yahoo.com

2 1

re: shlwapi failes to build on windows
by Jon Griffiths 12 Sep '02

12 Sep '02

Hi, >shlwapi.exp(.edata+0x34):fake: undefined reference to >`AssocCreate@12' >C:\mingw\bin\dllwrap.exe: C:\mingw\bin\gcc exited with status 1 >make: *** [shlwapi.dll] Error 1 >The def should contain AssocCreate@24 I do not know what is needed >in the *.spec though This is due to the spec entry possibly being incorrect. AssocCreate takes a CLSID as its first parameter (rather than a ptr to one as any sane coder would have expected). I have no idea how to tell the spec file that the first parameter is a structure, however this obviously means that the size of the parameters listed after the '@' is wrong. I'm not sure how to fix this, since passing structs is a rare case, I've never looked into how to specify them in the spec. Maybe we need a "struct(n)" spec type for by value structures? Another note: if you're planning to try to test SHLWAPI under Windows you should be running NT 4 or later, as there are some changes needed w.r.t unicode to get earlier O/Ss working OK. Cheers, Jon ===== "Don't wait for the seas to part, or messiahs to come; Don't you sit around and waste this chance..." - Live jon_p_griffiths(a)yahoo.com __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! News - Today's headlines http://news.yahoo.com

2 2

Fwd: Message Undeliverable
by Dimitrie O. Paun 12 Sep '02

12 Sep '02

This is the second (and I have a third now) message of this type that I receive, even though it seems that my messages to reach the list. What's up? ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: Message Undeliverable Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 15:40:19 -0600 From: postmaster(a)www.praize.com To: dpaun(a)rogers.com User does not exist Message Headers: Return-Path: <wine-patches-admin(a)winehq.com> Received: from admin.praize.com (root@localhost) by praize.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8CLcxP18778 for <gboutwel(a)praize.com>; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 15:38:59 -0600 X-ClientAddr: 198.144.4.3 Received: from wine.codeweavers.com (wine.codeweavers.com [198.144.4.3]) by admin.praize.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8CLcwD18774 for <gboutwel(a)praize.com>; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 15:38:58 -0600 Received: from localhost.localdomain (wine [127.0.0.1]) by wine.codeweavers.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8CLb6F27723; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 16:37:06 -0500 Received: from fep04-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com (fep04-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.86.74]) by wine.codeweavers.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g8CLaeF27686 for <wine-patches(a)winehq.com>; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 16:36:41 -0500 Received: from dimi.dssd.ca ([24.103.156.204]) by fep04-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com (InterMail vM.5.01.05.06 201-253-122-126-106-20020509) with ESMTP id <20020912213628.FCWQ389684.fep04-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com(a)dimi.dss d.ca> for <wine-patches(a)winehq.com>; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 17:36:28 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" From: "Dimitrie O. Paun" <dpaun(a)rogers.com> Organization: DSSD Software Inc. To: Wine Patches <wine-patches(a)winehq.com> Subject: Trackbar updates User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200209121734.32094.dpaun(a)rogers.com> X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH LOGIN at fep04-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com from [24.103.156.204] using ID <dpaun(a)rogers.com> at Thu, 12 Sep 2002 17:36:27 -0400 Sender: wine-patches-admin(a)winehq.com Errors-To: wine-patches-admin(a)winehq.com X-BeenThere: wine-patches(a)winehq.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: wine-devel(a)winehq.com X-Reply-To: dpaun(a)rogers.com List-Help: <mailto:wine-patches-request@winehq.com?subject=help> List-Post: <mailto:wine-patches@winehq.com> List-Subscribe: <http://www.winehq.com/mailman/listinfo/wine-patches>, <mailto:wine-patches-request@winehq.com?subject=subscribe> List-Id: Wine Patch Submissions <wine-patches.winehq.com> List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.winehq.com/mailman/listinfo/wine-patches>, <mailto:wine-patches-request@winehq.com?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-patches/> Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 17:34:31 -0400 Status: ------------------------------------------------------- -- Dimi.

2 1

Re: WineLib and DLLs
by Jon Griffiths 12 Sep '02

12 Sep '02

Hi, >I'm writing a WineLib DLL that makes calls in my own Windows DLLs >(not Wine's DLLs). I have the header files for those DLLs, and the >Windows binaries for them. How do I link to them? Do I need to wrap >them in spec files? What do I need to put into my Makefile.in? look at tools/winedump. In spec mode it will generate everything you need to link to this dll - a makefile and dummy implementation, spec file and a script to insert it into your existing WINE tree (to link with). The README gives instructions for exactly this case (and some other more advanced ones). Cheers, Jon ===== "Don't wait for the seas to part, or messiahs to come; Don't you sit around and waste this chance..." - Live jon_p_griffiths(a)yahoo.com __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! News - Today's headlines http://news.yahoo.com

1 0

Re: SHLWAPI merging #4
by Alexandre Julliard 12 Sep '02

12 Sep '02

Jon <jon_p_griffiths(a)yahoo.com> writes: > Does anyone object to my moving SHLWAPI_1 & 2 into url.c and moving out the > definitions from ordinal.h in there as well? > > I want to tidy this up because at some point in the not too distant future the > ordinal code will get a lot bigger. So it makes sense to me to implement > ordinals that are related in the same files (like the MIME ord. functions in > url.c), and to split out other ord. groups (gdi/windows/com/ie/perfmon etc) > into their own files as well. OK? Actually there's no reason at all to group ordinal functions together, the fact that they are exported by ordinal is just a detail that doesn't matter for understanding what's going on. It's much better to group ordinal string functions with other string functions, ordinal URL functions with other URL stuff etc. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.com

2 1

Re: WineLib and DLLs
by steve.lustbader＠philips.com 12 Sep '02

12 Sep '02

I also have the .lib and .pdb files for the DLLs, if that helps. I'm writing a WineLib DLL that makes calls in my own Windows DLLs (not Wine's DLLs). I have the header files for those DLLs, and the Windows binaries for them. How do I link to them? Do I need to wrap them in spec files? What do I need to put into my Makefile.in? There are instructions in the WineLib docs about binary DLLs, but they seem to be talking about pretending a Linux library is a DLL, which is not what I want to do. -Steve

1 0

WineLib and DLLs
by steve.lustbader＠philips.com 12 Sep '02

12 Sep '02

I'm writing a WineLib DLL that makes calls in my own Windows DLLs (not Wine's DLLs). I have the header files for those DLLs, and the Windows binaries for them. How do I link to them? Do I need to wrap them in spec files? What do I need to put into my Makefile.in? There are instructions in the WineLib docs about binary DLLs, but they seem to be talking about pretending a Linux library is a DLL, which is not what I want to do. -Steve

1 0

Re: Unicode functions
by steve.lustbader＠philips.com 12 Sep '02

12 Sep '02

Thanks, that worked! Do you think you could update the Unicode section in the WineLib user's guide (section 2.2)? It doesn't even mention WINE_UNICODE_NATIVE (not like the rest of the guide is that current, but every little bit helps for new developers). -Steve On Thu, 12 Sep 2002 steve.lustbader(a)philips.com wrote: > I think there is issue with _T(x). I have this line in my Windows app > that I'm compiling with WineLib (I'm using -fshort-wchar): > > const TCHAR *Name() const { return _T("my_name"); }; > > The compiler gives me an error of: > > cannot convert `const __wchar_t *' to `const > TCHAR *' in return If you are using --fshort-wchar you should also use WINE_UNICODE_NATIVE so that WCHAR gets defined to wchar_t. From winnt.h: #ifdef WINE_UNICODE_NATIVE typedef wchar_t WCHAR, *PWCHAR; #else typedef unsigned short WCHAR, *PWCHAR; #endif and further down: /* Define WINE_UNICODE_NATIVE if: * - your compiler provides a 16bit wchar_t type, e.g. gcc >= 2.96 with * -fshort-wchar option * - or if you decide to use the native 32bit Unix wchar_t type. Be aware * though that the Wine APIs only support 16bit WCHAR characters for * binary compatibility reasons. * - or define nothing at all if you don't use Unicode, and blissfully * ignore the issue :-) */ Does that help? -- Francois Gouget fgouget(a)free.fr http://fgouget.free.fr/ May your Tongue stick to the Roof of your Mouth with the Force of a Thousand Caramels

1 0

shlwapi failes to build on windows
by Steven Edwards 12 Sep '02

12 Sep '02

shlwapi.exp(.edata+0x34):fake: undefined reference to `AssocCreate@12' C:\mingw\bin\dllwrap.exe: C:\mingw\bin\gcc exited with status 1 make: *** [shlwapi.dll] Error 1 The def should contain AssocCreate@24 I do not know what is needed in the *.spec though Thanks Steven __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! News - Today's headlines http://news.yahoo.com

1 0

Re: Unicode functions
by steve.lustbader＠philips.com 12 Sep '02

12 Sep '02

I think there is issue with _T(x). I have this line in my Windows app that I'm compiling with WineLib (I'm using -fshort-wchar): const TCHAR *Name() const { return _T("my_name"); }; The compiler gives me an error of: cannot convert `const __wchar_t *' to `const TCHAR *' in return It similarly complains about converting _T("foo") to a const WCHAR *. Both of these things work under Windows. Changing the definition of _T(x) from L##x to (TCHAR *) L##x avoids these problems, but then something like _T("foo") _T("bar") doesn't concatenate those strings like it does in Windows. -Steve --- steve.lustbader(a)philips.com wrote: > Are _tprintf and it's related functions (_ftprintf, > _stprintf) implemented? I found a tchar.h in the > source tree that defines these functions, but it > wasn't in my /usr/local/include/wine directory. I'm fixing the build process to install the header. For now you can copy it manually to the /usr/local/include/wine directory. Actually _ftprintf and _stprintf are not functions, but macros which are mapped in tchar.h to corresponding ASCII or Unicode function. The underlying functions should be implemented. > These functions aren't important for wine, since > they're simply defined as the ASCII or Unicode > version, but they are important for WineLib. > > What is the overall status of using Unicode with > WineLib? What needs to be defined and what headers > need to be included to get the functionality from > Windows' tchar.h (_T(), TCHAR, the above functions, > etc)? Unicode is supported relatively well in Wine. Please report if you have any issues with it. Andriy __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! News - Today's headlines http://news.yahoo.com

3 2

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-devel