Hi,
It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below.
Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch.
If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise
please ask for the known failures list to be updated.
The full results can be found at:
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=120357
Your paranoid android.
=== debian11 (32 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:67: Test succeeded inside todo block: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 203.
Unhandled exception: unimplemented function cabinet.dll.GetDllVersion called in 32-bit code (0x7b0122f6).
=== debian11 (32 bit Arabic:Morocco report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:67: Test succeeded inside todo block: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 203.
Unhandled exception: unimplemented function cabinet.dll.GetDllVersion called in 32-bit code (0x7b0122f6).
=== debian11 (32 bit German report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:67: Test succeeded inside todo block: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 203.
Unhandled exception: unimplemented function cabinet.dll.GetDllVersion called in 32-bit code (0x7b0122f6).
=== debian11 (32 bit French report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:67: Test succeeded inside todo block: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 203.
Unhandled exception: unimplemented function cabinet.dll.GetDllVersion called in 32-bit code (0x7b0122f6).
=== debian11 (32 bit Hebrew:Israel report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:67: Test succeeded inside todo block: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 203.
Unhandled exception: unimplemented function cabinet.dll.GetDllVersion called in 32-bit code (0x7b0122f6).
=== debian11 (32 bit Hindi:India report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:67: Test succeeded inside todo block: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 203.
Unhandled exception: unimplemented function cabinet.dll.GetDllVersion called in 32-bit code (0x7b0122f6).
=== debian11 (32 bit Japanese:Japan report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:67: Test succeeded inside todo block: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 203.
Unhandled exception: unimplemented function cabinet.dll.GetDllVersion called in 32-bit code (0x7b0122f6).
=== debian11 (32 bit Chinese:China report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:67: Test succeeded inside todo block: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 203.
Unhandled exception: unimplemented function cabinet.dll.GetDllVersion called in 32-bit code (0x7b0122f6).
=== debian11 (32 bit WoW report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:67: Test succeeded inside todo block: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 203.
Unhandled exception: unimplemented function cabinet.dll.GetDllVersion called in 32-bit code (0x7b0122f6).
=== debian11 (64 bit WoW report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:67: Test succeeded inside todo block: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 203.
Unhandled exception: unimplemented function cabinet.dll.GetDllVersion called in 64-bit code (0x0000007b0138ae).
Hi,
It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below.
Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch.
If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise
please ask for the known failures list to be updated.
The full results can be found at:
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=120356
Your paranoid android.
=== debian11 (32 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:67: Test succeeded inside todo block: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 203.
Unhandled exception: unimplemented function cabinet.dll.GetDllVersion called in 32-bit code (0x7b0122f6).
=== debian11 (32 bit Arabic:Morocco report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:67: Test succeeded inside todo block: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 203.
Unhandled exception: unimplemented function cabinet.dll.GetDllVersion called in 32-bit code (0x7b0122f6).
=== debian11 (32 bit German report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:67: Test succeeded inside todo block: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 203.
Unhandled exception: unimplemented function cabinet.dll.GetDllVersion called in 32-bit code (0x7b0122f6).
=== debian11 (32 bit French report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:67: Test succeeded inside todo block: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 203.
Unhandled exception: unimplemented function cabinet.dll.GetDllVersion called in 32-bit code (0x7b0122f6).
=== debian11 (32 bit Hebrew:Israel report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:67: Test succeeded inside todo block: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 203.
Unhandled exception: unimplemented function cabinet.dll.GetDllVersion called in 32-bit code (0x7b0122f6).
=== debian11 (32 bit Hindi:India report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:67: Test succeeded inside todo block: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 203.
Unhandled exception: unimplemented function cabinet.dll.GetDllVersion called in 32-bit code (0x7b0122f6).
=== debian11 (32 bit Japanese:Japan report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:67: Test succeeded inside todo block: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 203.
Unhandled exception: unimplemented function cabinet.dll.GetDllVersion called in 32-bit code (0x7b0122f6).
=== debian11 (32 bit Chinese:China report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:67: Test succeeded inside todo block: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 203.
Unhandled exception: unimplemented function cabinet.dll.GetDllVersion called in 32-bit code (0x7b0122f6).
=== debian11 (32 bit WoW report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:67: Test succeeded inside todo block: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 203.
Unhandled exception: unimplemented function cabinet.dll.GetDllVersion called in 32-bit code (0x7b0122f6).
=== debian11 (64 bit WoW report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:67: Test succeeded inside todo block: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 203.
Unhandled exception: unimplemented function cabinet.dll.GetDllVersion called in 64-bit code (0x0000007b0138ae).
Hi,
It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below.
Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch.
If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise
please ask for the known failures list to be updated.
The full results can be found at:
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=120354
Your paranoid android.
=== w7u_2qxl (32 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
=== w7u_adm (32 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
=== w7u_el (32 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
=== w8 (32 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
=== w8adm (32 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
=== w864 (32 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
=== w1064v1507 (32 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
=== w1064v1809 (32 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
=== w1064 (32 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
=== w1064_tsign (32 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
=== w10pro64 (32 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
=== w864 (64 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
=== w1064v1507 (64 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
=== w1064v1809 (64 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
=== w1064 (64 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
=== w1064_2qxl (64 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
=== w1064_adm (64 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
=== w1064_tsign (64 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
=== w10pro64 (64 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
=== w10pro64_en_AE_u8 (64 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
=== w10pro64_ar (64 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
=== w10pro64_ja (64 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
=== w10pro64_zh_CN (64 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
=== debian11 (32 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:67: Test succeeded inside todo block: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 203.
Unhandled exception: unimplemented function cabinet.dll.GetDllVersion called in 32-bit code (0x7b0122f6).
=== debian11 (32 bit Arabic:Morocco report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:67: Test succeeded inside todo block: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 203.
Unhandled exception: unimplemented function cabinet.dll.GetDllVersion called in 32-bit code (0x7b0122f6).
=== debian11 (32 bit German report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:67: Test succeeded inside todo block: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 203.
Unhandled exception: unimplemented function cabinet.dll.GetDllVersion called in 32-bit code (0x7b0122f6).
=== debian11 (32 bit French report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:67: Test succeeded inside todo block: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 203.
Unhandled exception: unimplemented function cabinet.dll.GetDllVersion called in 32-bit code (0x7b0122f6).
=== debian11 (32 bit Hebrew:Israel report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:67: Test succeeded inside todo block: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 203.
Unhandled exception: unimplemented function cabinet.dll.GetDllVersion called in 32-bit code (0x7b0122f6).
=== debian11 (32 bit Hindi:India report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:67: Test succeeded inside todo block: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 203.
Unhandled exception: unimplemented function cabinet.dll.GetDllVersion called in 32-bit code (0x7b0122f6).
=== debian11 (32 bit Japanese:Japan report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:67: Test succeeded inside todo block: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 203.
Unhandled exception: unimplemented function cabinet.dll.GetDllVersion called in 32-bit code (0x7b0122f6).
=== debian11 (32 bit Chinese:China report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:67: Test succeeded inside todo block: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 203.
Unhandled exception: unimplemented function cabinet.dll.GetDllVersion called in 32-bit code (0x7b0122f6).
=== debian11 (32 bit WoW report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:67: Test succeeded inside todo block: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 203.
Unhandled exception: unimplemented function cabinet.dll.GetDllVersion called in 32-bit code (0x7b0122f6).
=== debian11 (64 bit WoW report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:67: Test succeeded inside todo block: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 203.
Unhandled exception: unimplemented function cabinet.dll.GetDllVersion called in 64-bit code (0x0000007b0138ae).
Hi,
It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below.
Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch.
If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise
please ask for the known failures list to be updated.
The full results can be found at:
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=120351
Your paranoid android.
=== w7u_2qxl (32 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
version.c:67: Test failed: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 127.
=== w7u_adm (32 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
version.c:67: Test failed: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 127.
=== w7u_el (32 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
version.c:67: Test failed: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 127.
=== w8 (32 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
version.c:67: Test failed: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 127.
=== w8adm (32 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
version.c:67: Test failed: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 127.
=== w864 (32 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
version.c:67: Test failed: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 127.
=== w1064v1507 (32 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
version.c:67: Test failed: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 127.
=== w1064v1809 (32 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
version.c:67: Test failed: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 127.
=== w1064 (32 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
version.c:67: Test failed: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 127.
=== w1064_tsign (32 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
version.c:67: Test failed: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 127.
=== w10pro64 (32 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
version.c:67: Test failed: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 127.
=== w864 (64 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
version.c:67: Test failed: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 127.
=== w1064v1507 (64 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
version.c:67: Test failed: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 127.
=== w1064v1809 (64 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
version.c:67: Test failed: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 127.
=== w1064 (64 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
version.c:67: Test failed: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 127.
=== w1064_2qxl (64 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
version.c:67: Test failed: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 127.
=== w1064_adm (64 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
version.c:67: Test failed: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 127.
=== w1064_tsign (64 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
version.c:67: Test failed: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 127.
=== w10pro64 (64 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
version.c:67: Test failed: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 127.
=== w10pro64_en_AE_u8 (64 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
version.c:67: Test failed: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 127.
=== w10pro64_ar (64 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
version.c:67: Test failed: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 127.
=== w10pro64_ja (64 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
version.c:67: Test failed: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 127.
=== w10pro64_zh_CN (64 bit report) ===
cabinet:
version.c:57: Test failed: Cabinet struct doesn't contain correct version: Error = 203.
version.c:67: Test failed: Function GetDllVersion in DLL not found: Error = 127.
Hi,
It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below.
Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch.
If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise
please ask for the known failures list to be updated.
The full results can be found at:
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=120345
Your paranoid android.
=== debian11 (32 bit report) ===
ws2_32:
sock.c:8699: Test failed: got 0
=== debian11 (32 bit Arabic:Morocco report) ===
ws2_32:
sock.c:8699: Test failed: got 0
=== debian11 (32 bit German report) ===
ws2_32:
sock.c:8699: Test failed: got 0
=== debian11 (32 bit French report) ===
ws2_32:
sock.c:8699: Test failed: got 0
=== debian11 (32 bit Hebrew:Israel report) ===
ws2_32:
sock.c:8699: Test failed: got 0
=== debian11 (32 bit Hindi:India report) ===
ws2_32:
sock.c:8699: Test failed: got 0
=== debian11 (32 bit Japanese:Japan report) ===
ws2_32:
sock.c:8699: Test failed: got 0
=== debian11 (32 bit Chinese:China report) ===
ws2_32:
sock.c:8699: Test failed: got 0
=== debian11 (32 bit WoW report) ===
ws2_32:
sock.c:8699: Test failed: got 0
=== debian11 (64 bit WoW report) ===
ws2_32:
sock.c:8699: Test failed: got 0
Hi,
It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below.
Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch.
If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise
please ask for the known failures list to be updated.
The full results can be found at:
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=120344
Your paranoid android.
=== debian11 (32 bit report) ===
ws2_32:
sock.c:8693: Test failed: got 0
=== debian11 (32 bit Arabic:Morocco report) ===
ws2_32:
sock.c:8693: Test failed: got 0
=== debian11 (32 bit German report) ===
ws2_32:
sock.c:8693: Test failed: got 0
=== debian11 (32 bit French report) ===
ws2_32:
sock.c:8693: Test failed: got 0
=== debian11 (32 bit Hebrew:Israel report) ===
ws2_32:
sock.c:8693: Test failed: got 0
=== debian11 (32 bit Hindi:India report) ===
ws2_32:
sock.c:8693: Test failed: got 0
=== debian11 (32 bit Japanese:Japan report) ===
ws2_32:
sock.c:8693: Test failed: got 0
=== debian11 (32 bit Chinese:China report) ===
ws2_32:
sock.c:8693: Test failed: got 0
=== debian11 (32 bit WoW report) ===
ws2_32:
sock.c:8693: Test failed: got 0
=== debian11 (64 bit WoW report) ===
ws2_32:
sock.c:8693: Test failed: got 0
Hi,
It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below.
Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch.
If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise
please ask for the known failures list to be updated.
The full results can be found at:
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=120342
Your paranoid android.
=== debian11 (32 bit report) ===
ws2_32:
sock.c:8693: Test failed: got 0
=== debian11 (32 bit Arabic:Morocco report) ===
ws2_32:
sock.c:8693: Test failed: got 0
=== debian11 (32 bit German report) ===
ws2_32:
sock.c:8693: Test failed: got 0
=== debian11 (32 bit French report) ===
ws2_32:
sock.c:8693: Test failed: got 0
=== debian11 (32 bit Hebrew:Israel report) ===
ws2_32:
sock.c:8693: Test failed: got 0
=== debian11 (32 bit Hindi:India report) ===
ws2_32:
sock.c:8693: Test failed: got 0
=== debian11 (32 bit Japanese:Japan report) ===
ws2_32:
sock.c:8693: Test failed: got 0
=== debian11 (32 bit Chinese:China report) ===
ws2_32:
sock.c:8693: Test failed: got 0
=== debian11 (32 bit WoW report) ===
ws2_32:
sock.c:8693: Test failed: got 0
=== debian11 (64 bit WoW report) ===
ws2_32:
sock.c:8693: Test failed: got 0
Hi,
It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below.
Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch.
If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise
please ask for the known failures list to be updated.
The full results can be found at:
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=120332
Your paranoid android.
=== debian11 (build log) ===
../wine/dlls/cabinet/cabinet_main.c:58:13: error: conflicting types for ‘DllGetVersion’
Task: The win32 Wine build failed
=== debian11 (build log) ===
../wine/dlls/cabinet/cabinet_main.c:58:13: error: conflicting types for ‘DllGetVersion’
Task: The wow64 Wine build failed
Hi,
It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below.
Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch.
If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise
please ask for the known failures list to be updated.
The full results can be found at:
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=120331
Your paranoid android.
=== debian11 (build log) ===
../wine/dlls/cabinet/cabinet_main.c:58:13: error: conflicting types for ‘DllGetVersion’
Task: The win32 Wine build failed
=== debian11 (build log) ===
../wine/dlls/cabinet/cabinet_main.c:58:13: error: conflicting types for ‘DllGetVersion’
Task: The wow64 Wine build failed