wine-devel

wine-devel@winehq.org

1 participants
84464 discussions

listview: last column problem
by Rein Klazes 30 Oct '02

30 Oct '02

Dimitri, The missing last column in newsbin seems to be caused by this line: | if (!lpColumn || nColumn < 0 || nColumn > infoPtr->hdpaColumns->nItemCount) return -1; | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ removing the marked part of the test result in a couple of error messages: | err:listview:LISTVIEW_InsertColumnT nColumn=4, nNewColumn=3 | err:listview:LISTVIEW_InsertColumnT nColumn=4, nNewColumn=3 | err:listview:LISTVIEW_InsertColumnT nColumn=4, nNewColumn=3 but otherwise runs fine. Do you see any objections removing the test and error message? Rein. -- Rein Klazes rklazes(a)xs4all.nl

2 2

Re: PATCH: ppc fix 2
by Greg Turner 30 Oct '02

30 Oct '02

On Wednesday 30 October 2002 07:22 am, Marcus Meissner wrote: > Hi, > > Just a bad macro. > > ciao, marcus > > Changelog: > Fixed LITTLE_ENDIAN_32_READ macro to at least compile. > > Index: ndr_marshall.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/wine/wine/dlls/rpcrt4/ndr_marshall.c,v > retrieving revision 1.9 > diff -u -r1.9 ndr_marshall.c > --- ndr_marshall.c 29 Oct 2002 23:07:33 -0000 1.9 > +++ ndr_marshall.c 30 Oct 2002 13:21:15 -0000 > @@ -59,8 +59,8 @@ > > #define LITTLE_ENDIAN_32_READ(pchar) \ > (MAKELONG( \ > - MAKEWORD(*(pchar), *((pchar)+1)) \ > - MAKEWORD(*((pchar)+2), *((pchar)+3))) > + MAKEWORD(*(pchar), *((pchar)+1)), \ > + MAKEWORD(*((pchar)+2), *((pchar)+3)))) > #endif > > /* oh, it's non-i386 only, and I guess I never tested this one... makes sense now, ignore my previous comment. -- gmt "The purpose of government is to rein in the rights of the people" --President Bill Clinton, MTV interview, 1993

1 0

EMF bug?
by Domsodi Gergely 30 Oct '02

30 Oct '02

Hi! I am not sure if this is a bug, or I did something wrong. My collegaues made a little program what shows the bug. It shows an EMF file, but the text boxes appears bad. Two screenshots and the source are included in the tar.gz. Please somebody examine it, and help me if you can. The source, binaries, and screenshots can be downloaded from ftp://ftp.uhulinux.hu/misc/testprg.tar.gz. It needs to be exctracted to the wine c:\ directory Thanks for your help in advance! If needed I can send you wine debug msgs. -- doome _______________________________________________ wine-users mailing list wine-users(a)winehq.com http://www.winehq.com/mailman/listinfo/wine-users -- Dömsödi Gergely UHU-Linux Csapat

1 0

RE: winapi update
by Patrik Stridvall 30 Oct '02

30 Oct '02

> On October 29, 2002 11:27 am, Patrik Stridvall wrote: > > Anyway, I can't inline my patches the because Microsoft > Outlook wraps > > the lines and I sure a lot of other people that use attachments have > > similar problems. > > And can't be turned off?!? Hmmm, anyway, just attach them as > text/plain. I have no idea how or if it is possible to do either.

4 3

What is a leap second
by György 'Nog' Jeney 30 Oct '02

30 Oct '02

While I was looking through dlls/ntdll/time.c I came across the following two comments: "FIXME: Compute the number of leap second corrections here" and "FIXME: get the GMT offset here" What do these this mean? nog.

4 6

DSTRICT: some more fixes for the user dll
by Michael Stefaniuc 29 Oct '02

29 Oct '02

Hello, this fixes 117 warning in the user dll when compiled with -DSTRICT License: LGPL, X11 Changelog: Michael Stefaniuc <mstefani(a)redhat.com> - some more fixes for compiling the user dll with -DSTRICT bye michael -- Michael Stefaniuc Tel.: +49-711-96437-199 System Administration Fax.: +49-711-96437-111 Red Hat GmbH Email: mstefani(a)redhat.com Hauptstaetterstr. 58 http://www.redhat.de/ D-70178 Stuttgart

1 1

RE: What is a leap second
by Medland, Bill 29 Oct '02

29 Oct '02

> -----Original Message----- > From: wine-devel-admin(a)winehq.com > [mailto:wine-devel-admin@winehq.com]On > Behalf Of György 'Nog' Jeney > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 10:46 AM > To: wine-devel(a)winehq.com > Subject: What is a leap second > > > > While I was looking through dlls/ntdll/time.c I came across > the following > two comments: "FIXME: Compute the number of leap second > corrections here" > and "FIXME: get the GMT offset here" What do these this mean? > > nog. > > > > (Trying to avoid repeating everyone else) The best source I know for information on leap seconds is http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/leapsec.html That includes a link to the list of when the leap seconds have been. I was also looking at "time" over the past couple of days, from the "GetDateFormat" side of things (files/dos_fs.c). I note that (Win98) SystemTimeToFileTime etc do not include any leap seconds (i.e. file time assumes no leap seconds). Bill

1 0

rpc_H_PL3 (do not apply)
by Greg Turner 29 Oct '02

29 Oct '02

This fixes wineserver crashes exposed by recent tests, in the unmerged parts of the RPC code. Parts of this may never see the light of day. Relative to H_PL0, of course. LICENSE: X11 CHANGELOG: * dlls/rpcrt4: rpc_epmap.c; server: rpc_epmap.c: Greg Turner <gmturner007(a)ameritech.net> - don't crash the wineserver. - don't printf("%s", NULL). -- gmt "The purpose of government is to rein in the rights of the people" --President Bill Clinton, MTV interview, 1993

1 0

Re: Bug #321: dlls/msvct/vf[w]printf functions (Patch 2)
by Shachar Shemesh 29 Oct '02

29 Oct '02

Jaco Greeff wrote: >On Tue, 29 Oct 2002 21:10:52 +0100, Andreas Mohr ><andi(a)rhlx01.fht-esslingen.de> wrote : > > >>[insert some rant about certain highly non-rewarding functions here...] >> >>Still, you're doing some pretty essential work, so let me just say thanks >>for your (annoying ?) work ! >> >> > >Annoying? Sometimes. Boring? Never. I'm enjoying every minute of it, as long >as I don't get to frustrate myself with idiotic mistakes. (Of which I've had >a couple in the last week, the last one just took the prize :)) > I don't know. My personal best is to spend two weeks chasing a one wrong character bug. What's more, it was introduced after adding ~20 lines of code, and I knew it. Beat that! To my credit I will say that this was assembly (68000), and that the problem manifested itself in such an unrelated area of the program, that I overruled my own judgment and searched the problem in the vicinity of where it happened. As life would have it, the real problem was a missing "#" (which means "use immediate value X", so instead it read "Take value from address X"). > O, well, >maybe I just need some extra sleep. > >Thanks a lot, encouragement is always appreciated. > > > >

1 0

Bug in SYSDEPS_CallOnStack()?
by Juraj Hercek 29 Oct '02

29 Oct '02

Hi, When I was trying to get wine working on sparc solaris, I experienced troubles with exception handling. I always got error (after Ctrl + C): err:seh:EXC_DefaultHandling Exception frame is not in stack limits => unable to dispatch exception. After deeper insight into wine's guts I've figured out that problem lies in SYSDEPS_CallOnStack function (scheduler/sysdeps.c:236), which doesn't switch thread stack on sparcs -> I'll try to implement this soon. I also looked at implementation of this function for __i386__ (since it was just a couple of lines above... :o) ) and I think there is a mistake in implementation for _MSC_VER compiler. Original: ... __asm mov edx, 8[esp]; __asm mov fs:[0x04], esp; <--- __asm push edx; ... I think it should look like this: ... __asm mov edx, 8[esp]; __asm mov esp, fs:[0x04]; <--- __asm push edx; ... Just some questions: Is anyone compiling wine with microsoft compiler? If so, what are the reasons? Next, current snapshot from cvs doesn't compile on solaris, is anyone compiling wine on solaris? Regards, Juraj

4 3

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-devel