wine-devel

wine-devel@winehq.org

3 participants
84400 discussions

Re: InstallShield 6 again (debuggers requested)
by Gerard Patel 29 Sep '01

29 Sep '01

At 03:11 AM 29/09/2001 -0700, you wrote: >> Probably only that there's a problem with your setup. For example, perhaps >> you forgot to copy stdole32.tlb from real windows, as instructed? > > > No , I did that.. Well, did you import all the registry entries in winedefault.reg then ? Gerard

3 3

Re: fixme:pthread_kill_other_threads
by Eric Pouech 28 Sep '01

28 Sep '01

> 51145 096d4e18:Call x11drv.MsgWaitForMultipleObjectsEx(00000001,403faec4,ffffffff,00000000,00000000) ret=406c7efd can you check that at this point (DWORD*)0x403faec4 points to the handle of the event created above ? (0x7C IIRC) if it's the case, it means that the started program rely on some messages order to do some stuff the expected behavior would be for the second program to set the event (7c) under certain circumstances, which shall be triggered from a given message... A+ --------------- Eric Pouech (http://perso.wanadoo.fr/eric.pouech/) The future will be better tomorrow, Vice President Dan Quayle __________________________________________________ Voila vous propose une boite aux lettres gratuite sur Voila Mail: http://mail.voila.fr

4 4

fixme:pthread_kill_other_threads
by Uwe Bonnes 28 Sep '01

28 Sep '01

Hallo, I don't understand why pthread_kill_other_threads ist called when a programm creates a new process. With the pthread_kill_other_threads call, the starting process dies. This is a +relay,+server,+... log: trace:dosfs:DOSFS_GetFullName returning /home/dosd/cae/ql82/scs/TKWDOG.EXE = D:\CAE\QL82\SCS\TKWDOG.EXE 08068938: new_process( inherit_all=0, create_flags=67108864, start_flags=257, exe_file=200, hstdin=4, hstdout=8, hstderr=12, cmd_show=1, filename="D:\cae\ql82\scs\TKWDOG.EXE" ) 08068938: new_process() = 0 { info=204 } fixme:pthread_kill_other_threads_np 08068938: select( flags=12, cookie=0x405c5778, sec=1001624181, usec=913175, handles={204} ) 08068938: select() = PENDING 00000000: *fd* 0 -> 46 08625a70: *fd* 6 <- 46 08625a70: *fd* 8 <- 47 08625a70: init_thread( unix_pid=2070, teb=0x40127ce0, entry=(nil), reply_fd=6, wait_fd=8 ) 08625a70: init_thread() = 0 { pid=0x86259a0, tid=0x8625a70, boot=0, version=53 } This is an strace of that part: 1898 close(28) = 0 1898 chdir("/home/dosd/cae/ql82/scs") = 0 1898 write(2, "fixme:pthread_kill_other_threads"..., 36) = 36 1898 execve("/usr/local/bin/wine", ["/usr/local/bin/wine", "--", "tkwdog.exe"], [/* 57 vars */] <unfinished ...> and I think this relates to scheduler/process.c:fork_and_exec if (newdir) chdir(newdir); if (argv && envp) { if (!filename) { argv[1] = "--"; exec_wine_binary( argv, envp ); } else execve( filename, argv, envp ); } What can happen between chdir() and execve() to trigger the pthread_kill_other_threads() call? Bye Uwe Bonnes bon(a)elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de Free Software: If you contribute nothing, expect nothing --

3 3

Re: _NET_WM_NAME support patch
by Dmitry Timoshkov 27 Sep '01

27 Sep '01

"Ilya Konstantinov" <wine-patches(a)future.shiny.co.il> wrote: > This patch adds a _NET_WM_NAME(UTF8_STRING) property to every window, > storing it's title in non-ambigous UTF8 encoding. This is a part of the > NET_WM standard. The UTF8 title feature is currently implemented only > by KWin (KDE's window manager), but is adopted by both GNOME and KDE > camps. @@ -746,12 +748,32 @@ BOOL X11DRV_SetWindowText( HWND hwnd, LP return FALSE; } WideCharToMultiByte(text_cp, 0, text, -1, buffer, count, NULL, NULL); + + count = utf8_wcstombs(text, strlenW(text), utf8_buffer, 0); Why didn't you use win32 call instead of a purely internal one? count = WideCharToMultiByte( CP_UTF8, 0, text, -1, NULL, 0, NULL, NULL ); utf8_buffer = HeapAlloc( GetProcessHeap(), 0, count ); count = WideCharToMultiByte( CP_UTF8, 0, text, -1, utf8_buffer, count, NULL, NULL ); -- Dmitry.

1 0

Problem in installation of Wine on SPARC Solaris 8.0
by Mrugan Bhorkar 27 Sep '01

27 Sep '01

I am trying to install Wine on UltraSPARC Solaris 8.0 using tools/wineinstall. The installation script fails at following point...... gcc -c -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -g -O2 -Wall -D__WINE__ -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/openwin/include -o lex.ppl.o lex.ppl.c In file included from ./ppl.l:141: ../../include/config.h:486: warning: `_FILE_OFFSET_BITS' redefined /usr/include/sys/feature_tests.h:96: warning: this is the location of the previous definition ./ppl.l: In function `pplex': ./ppl.l:336: `pplval' undeclared (first use in this function) ./ppl.l:336: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once ./ppl.l:336: for each function it appears in.) make: *** [lex.ppl.o] Error 1 Can anybody suggest how to fix this?? Thanks Mrugan __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Listen to your Yahoo! Mail messages from any phone. http://phone.yahoo.com

1 0

pthread_atfork and PTHREAD_FORK
by Bill Medland 26 Sep '01

26 Sep '01

Can someone tell me what we should have here? (It might be interesting to know how it's supposed to work too but that's beside the point). I had a case where pthread_atfork was being called with two null pointers, so it all blew up when PTHREAD_FORK tried to execute the code they pointed to. Is it legal for pthread_atfork to be called with null parameters (in which case I will correct PTHREAD_FORK, otherwise I'll assert the pointers). Bill

2 1

pthread_atfork problems
by Bill Medland 26 Sep '01

26 Sep '01

Any chance of a hand with this please? I have just traced a problem to the fact that __pthread_atfork is passed a couple of null pointers, which I presume is an illegal thing to do. Can anyone point me at the code that results in __pthread_atfork being called and/or explain why it would be called with null pointers? TIA Bill

1 0

Re: GetMessageTime
by Alexandre Julliard 26 Sep '01

26 Sep '01

"David Hammerton" <david(a)transgaming.com> writes: > BTW, One of the siderfects of this is: in dlls/x11drv/window.c line 1143, > GetMessageTime() is sometimes 0 (depends on the applicatoin, for example the > game Alice seems to make it return 0) - so the value sent to XSetInputFocus for > the time is too small, and hence X refuses to give the window focus. The real fix is that XSetInputFocus should not use GetMessageTime at all, this is only a temporary hack. To conform to the ICCCM the focus time should be based on the timestamp of a previous X event, and the focus should never be changed if we didn't receive an event. To do this right probably requires supporting the take focus protocol, as was discussed some time ago. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.com

1 0

Getting Routing tables
by Robert Lunnon 26 Sep '01

26 Sep '01

In my pitiful attempt to hack on WINE I have come to an impasse. I have managed to find portable equivalents to get the interface name and the number of interfaces in winsock/wsock32 but I can't seem to find a portable way to get to the routing table. In Solaris (why I'm doing the hacking) there is a vague mention in the man pages of being able to get this info by reading /dev/ip but no information about how to actually do it. Can anyone provide a hint on how this can be done portably or to a multi-os implementation of netstat that might serve as an example. (Only netstat sources I have found are OS specific) Hurry because in desperation I am actually thinking of piping the output of netstat -r Thanks Bob

2 1

BeginPaint not called on WM_PAINT...
by Andreas Mohr 25 Sep '01

25 Sep '01

Hi all, the game Undying emits lots and lots of err:msg:DispatchMessageA BeginPaint not called on WM_PAINT for hwnd 20029! errors. This is because it simply does: 0806d2c8:Call user32.DispatchMessageA(406c29b0) ret=1090e313 0806d2c8:Call window proc 0x11001530 (hwnd=00020029,msg=WM_PAINT,wp=00000000,lp=00000000) 0806d2c8:Call user32.ValidateRect(00020029,00000000) ret=11107b57 0806d2c8:Ret user32.ValidateRect() retval=00000001 ret=11107b57 0806d2c8:Ret window proc 0x11001530 (hwnd=00020029,msg=WM_PAINT,wp=00000000,lp=00000000) retval=00000000 This seems to be perfectly legal in order to validate the whole window update rect (NULL) and thus prevent further WM_PAINTs. (as http://www.intrepidhero.com/articles/wgpfd_errata/part2.html hints) In short: the wine error message is erroneous in this case. The Wine check is: if (painting && wndPtr && (wndPtr->flags & WIN_NEEDS_BEGINPAINT) && wndPtr->hrgnUpdate) { ERR("BeginPaint not called on WM_PAINT for hwnd %04x!\n", msg->hwnd); So I assume that either a) some flag or so doesn't get updated properly by that ValidateRect() or b) the error message check condition is (slightly) wrong. Could someone please fix this ? This happened to #WineHQ nick Thunderbird with latest version of winex (20010824). -- Andreas Mohr Stauferstr. 6, D-71272 Renningen, Germany Tel. +49 7159 800604 http://home.nexgo.de/andi.mohr/

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-devel