wine-devel

wine-devel@winehq.org

9 participants
84397 discussions

AnimateWindow() calls SetWindowPos() on a timer???
by Bobby Bingham 04 Jun '01

04 Jun '01

I am implementing AnimateWindow(), and I recorded all the messages win98 sent to my window when I called AnimateWindow(). It send a lot of groups of WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING, WM_NCCALCSIZE, and WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGED. The number of times it sends these seems to correspond to how long I tell it to make the animation, almost as if it were on a timer. It looks like it calls SetWindowPos() on the window a lot, but I don't see why they would do this. Does anyone know?? I can supply my test app once I clean it up a little. Bobby Bingham uhmmmm(a)ameritech.net

1 0

off topic: Windows 98 and binutils
by Brian Craft 03 Jun '01

03 Jun '01

Hey -- Sorry for the OT post, but I suspect someone here will know the answer to this. I'm trying to objdump some Windows 98 device drivers & dlls. Last time I did something like this it was user-mode code from 95 or NT (not sure which), and I just configured binutils for i386-pe. Only this same configuration won't read the Windows 98 files -- it says the file format isn't recognised. I can still read the old Windows binaries with this config. I also tried i386-msdos, for good measure. What's the scoop? 98 has a new format? Is there a binutils target that will do the job? b.c.

2 1

Re: PATCH: set_thread_buffer fixed
by Gerard Patel 03 Jun '01

03 Jun '01

At 07:19 PM 02/06/2001 +0200, you wrote: <snip> >I have now changed config.h to only enable 64bit support for glibc 2.2 >or better. After applying your patch to current cvs, rm config.cache, ./configure, make depend && make Wine crashes as before. Did you leave something to for Alexandre Julliard implicit (he certainly knows about this stuff, I don't) ? I don't understand why _FILE_OFFSET_BITS is still defined in config.h.in. Gerard

3 2

Re: PATCH: set_thread_buffer fixed
by Alexandre Julliard 03 Jun '01

03 Jun '01

Marcus Meissner <marcus(a)jet.franken.de> writes: > Enable 64bit file operations on Linux only for glibc 2.2 or better, > since mmap64 is broken on glibc 2.1. It would be much better to do a configure check. Including features.h from config.h is very ugly IMO (not to mention that mmap64 seems to work fine on my glibc 2.1.3...) -- Alexandre Julliard julliard(a)winehq.com

2 1

Re: PATCH: set_thread_buffer fixed
by Ove Kaaven 03 Jun '01

03 Jun '01

On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, Marcus Meissner wrote: > -/* This is for glibc on Linux, it will turn on 64 bit file support at compile time */ > -#define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS 64 > +#include <features.h> > +/* This is for glibc on Linux, it will turn on 64 bit file support at > + * compile time > + * Since glibc 2.1.x has various degrees of broken mmap64 prototypes, > + * we do not use this on glibc 2.1.x systems. > + */ > +#if (__GLIBC__ >= 2) && (__GLIBC_MINOR__ > 1) > +# define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS 64 > +#endif > + That's probably not going to work. The features.h is the only header that checks whether _FILE_OFFSET_BITS is defined, and it's protected against multiple inclusion, so _FILE_OFFSET_BITS must be defined *before* you include features.h. If you must check version, use autoconf.

1 0

Re: set_thread_buffer (fwd)
by lawson_whitney＠juno.com 02 Jun '01

02 Jun '01

This seems to have bounced once. Hope winehq feels better soon. On Fri, 1 Jun 2001 =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard_Patel_=3Cgerard.patel=40nerim.net=3E?=(a)tourian.nerim.net wrote: > Just what I have. > > if you verify if you have the same problem as myself, with current cvs > remove the line defining _FILE_OFFSET_BITS. This fixes it for me. > > Gerard > By this I understood to rip #define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS 64 out of config.h (and acconfig.h just to be sure) and rerun make. It recompiles nearly everything, of course, and makes a wine that will run my app again, so I guess it is the same problem. Now, what is the problem? :-/ glibc-2.1.3 - from Mandrake 7.2 - ?? - I am fairly sure I haven't munged any headers myself.. but Mandrake might have. Are <linux/ and <asm/ considered glibc headers? I don't see them in the rpm, but some motorist broke both my legs a while ago and it is too tough to change the CD and see what is in Slackware's glibc-2.1.2. I guess that wouldn't be conclusive anyway. gcc-2.95.2 locally built, with genuine strength-reduce bug. kernel 2.4.4 with devfs? Other? Feels to me like an inconsistancy between headers and library -? Lawson ---cut--- ________________________________________________________________ GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.

1 0

Re:AnimateWindow() constants?
by Eric Pouech 02 Jun '01

02 Jun '01

> I am about to implement the AnimateWindow() function, but I don't have up to > date windows headers. I did some trial and error on a win98 box and came up > with what I think are the correct values, but could somebody check? all correct A+ --------------- Eric Pouech (http://perso.wanadoo.fr/eric.pouech/) The future will be better tomorrow, Vice President Dan Quayle __________________________________________________ Voila vous propose une boite aux lettres gratuite sur Voila Mail: http://mail.voila.fr

1 0

wine-users down?
by Francois Gouget 02 Jun '01

02 Jun '01

Hi, I didn't receive any message on wine-users since May 30th. Is the mailing list down or is it a problem on my end? There's been many messages since then on the newsgroup. Btw, why is the link to the wine-users archive disabled on WineHQ? (http://www.winehq.com/dev.shtml#ml) I found wine-users archives via Google: http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-users/ And I see in the mailing list archives that there's no message since May 30th either. Looks like a mailing list problem to me... Last question (for this email...): Why do the mailing list archives point to the Integrita archives rather than the WineHQ archives? Is there an advantage of one over the other? -- Francois Gouget fgouget(a)free.fr http://fgouget.free.fr/ I haven't lost my mind, it's backed up on tape around here somewhere...

2 1

AnimateWindow() constants?
by Bobby Bingham 02 Jun '01

02 Jun '01

I am about to implement the AnimateWindow() function, but I don't have up to date windows headers. I did some trial and error on a win98 box and came up with what I think are the correct values, but could somebody check? AW_SLIDE 0x00040000 AW_ACTIVATE 0x00020000 AW_BLEND 0x00080000 AW_HIDE 0x00010000 AW_CENTER 0x00000010 AW_HOR_POSITIVE 0x00000001 AW_HOR_NEGATIVE 0x00000002 AW_VER_POSITIVE 0x00000004 AW_VER_NEGATIVE 0x00000008 I'm pretty sure about all of them except AW_BLEND because win98 doesn't implement it. Thanks in advance Bobby Bingham uhmmmm(a)ameritech.net

1 0

Finding (or not) the exact number of args
by Gaël de Chalendar 01 Jun '01

01 Jun '01

Hi, I'm trying to implement stubs for some missing ordinal functions in shlwapi. Reading the NOTES comment in dlls/shlwapi/ordinal.c I don't know if it is a good idea, but it allows explorer.exe (Win 98) to show its desktop and it is what I'm testing (just for fun. I do not hope to be able to use it right now). Anyway, it uses at a moment or another unimplemented ordinal functions. To implement their stubs, I begins with a lot of args, reducing this number until the function is passed. It seems to work but I wonder if I do not add only problems with this strategy. If I left the stack in a corrupted state, maybe the problem will become visible a lot later... I was not able to find in docs, mails archives or google groups any useful tip to find (simply) the right number of args. Particularly, the URL http://www.ece.cmu.edu/afs/ece/usr/dacut/www/src is dead. So, do I continue ? If yes, in this way or differently ? Thanks for your advices. Gael. PS: I will not read my mail until monday 28.

3 4

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

wine-devel