--- On Wed, 12/12/12, André Hentschel nerv@dawncrow.de wrote:
Am 12.12.2012 23:35, schrieb Hin-Tak Leung:
--- On Wed, 12/12/12, Josh DuBois duboisj@codeweavers.com
wrote:
wine-mono.
On 12/12/12 4:27 PM, Hin-Tak Leung wrote:
I am somewhat curious about the tar ball - why
is the
version 12 source (120MB) and so much bigger than
the
previous (44MB)? I can probably work it out by
downloading
and unpacking both, but I am feeling lazy...
Hin-Tak
Thank you. That makes sense - that's the size of mono
thereabouts. I guess my next question is, does it also have codeweaver-specific bits? Sorry this sounds rather lazy, but I am sure more than one person wants to know :-).
I bet it has as things without change like wine-gecko are not included. the problem is without a clean wine-mono checkout it's hard to see what changed, a folder with patches in addition would be great.
--
Best Regards, André Hentschel
Yes, I guess I'd be happier downloading a diff (against a specific "clean" upstream version), than downloading a big tar ball, then try to work out which upstream version it forked against, then do the diff myself.
Even if the diff is nothing beyond a diff, with a branket description: "diff against upstream wine/mono version/tag x.y.z".