Re: Fix for "Cluster size not supported" - resend

[Alexandre Julliard]

Rein Klazes  writes:
> Because as soon as fstatvfs is fixed (for some combination of
> kernel/filesystem/libc), you are wrong again. The f_blocks, f_bfree and
> other fields are supposed to be counted as f_frsize sized blocks. And at
> least for nfs, f_frsize does not always equal f_bsize.

Ah I see your point, yes I suppose glibc could try to do the clever
thing and scale the returned values according to f_frsize. So yes I
guess we have to give up on fstatvfs, too bad.