Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@baikal.ru wrote:
Nikolay Sivov nsivov@codeweavers.com wrote:
On 2/1/22 22:16, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Nikolay Sivov nsivov@codeweavers.com wrote:
It looks like assigning a reviewer for a patch doesn't work very well. Can the situation be improved somehow? Is there any responsibility of a reviewer for ignoring the assigment?
Since this is exactly the same as the original patches, same concerns expressed initially apply for it as well.
I didn't see any real concern. Could you please try to be more specific?
Everything that I mentioned before - using windows-specific font name both for tests and code changes for no good reason, especially since user won't have it installed;
That's not a problem at all: font with name Segoe UI Symbol could be added to Wine just like Tahoma, Wingdings, Webdings and others. I've already created such a font with just one glyph - 0x25d4.
char ranges picked rather arbitrarily with no explanation.
I have provided an explanation together with an application that generates complete dwrite fallback ranges.
If that helps I'm fine with just adding U+25A0..U+25FF (Geometric Shapes) fallback range that fully fits into Segoe UI Symbol, and is a very small subset covered by that font: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometric_Shapes_(Unicode) http://www.unicode-symbol.com/block/Geometric_Shapes.html
Aborting the conversation and not answering the questions to you, as a maintainer, is plain rude, isn't it, Nikolay?