Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
On March 23, 2004 2:46 am, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
Probably in the version I was working on, when this fix was done, There was something Screwy with the exceptions and the kernel code did not catch them. But now it does and returns a proper error.
But if that's the case, why is the test marked as todo_wine:
todo_wine- {
void* pProc = GetProcAddress((void*) 0x117 ,"NotARealFunc" ) ;int err = GetLastError() ;ok(pProc==NULL, "GetProcAdress copes with BAD HModule error is %d\n",err);printf( "GetProcAdress copes with BAD HModule error is %d\n",err);}
I don't think there is a point in submitting this test. I Just sent it because it was there. and thought may be you wanted to have a look. The test does pass with or with out the todo.
If on the subject. I have a question: What to do with testes that throw an exception ("fly") but don't do so on ms-windows? leaving that in, would stop the test application, and all tests after that would not preform. I did have a couple of cases like that.