On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 19:22, Detlef Riekenberg wrote:
Paul Vriens wrote:
the subject says it all. If yes, I will start adding some for the ones
IMHO that's a good idea.
I have added this one as a TODO on my list. What version-number should we give our DLLs. Some of them have already version 10.xxx, probably to get rid of any problem in the nearby future, for programs that check the version.
Should we give our DLLs the highest version currently available on all of the windows-versions (95 .... W2K3)? This will mean that someone (me ?) has to go over them from time to time to check whether this has changed. I do think (apart from the extra work) that it look better than 10.xxx.
Maybe we should add some comments in the version resource files like:
/* Windows-version Date Checked Version * * 95 * 98 * WinXP 08/21/05 5.1.2600.2180 * Win2K * Win2K3 /*
Any ideas, suggestions ?
Paul.