23 Apr
2012
23 Apr
'12
3:25 p.m.
Huw Davies huw@codeweavers.com wrote:
Perhaps the original commit was added to work around this issue?
No, it was added for a not related reason.
Note, you'll probably have to retrieve the metrics at the design size (2048) in order to get accurate values for these members. Simply up-scaling the values obtained at 100 ppem will lead to rounding errors. As you say, tests are needed.
Yeah, the tests are needed. For now I just wanted to make gdiplus not rely on broken behaviour.
--
Dmitry.