Mike McCormack wrote:
Jeff L wrote:
I have repackaged this as package.
Please don't split patches that depend on each other to make Wine compile and work correctly, or add dead code.
The point of having small patches is to make Wine easier to regression test, so we want things to work between every commit.
Mike, take the point that everyone has pointed out about dead code and c99. An accident of enthusiasm of Easter. I thought that numbering patches allowed for dependencies. I took the point from a recent comment and took a punt. As far as I can tell, patch 2 does not depend on 1 or 3 but 3 depends on 1 and 2. If I put them together, past experience says that I would have difficulty in getting them through. If I submit them one at a time it would take days to get them through iteratively.
Jeff