Re: winelauncher patch

[Ove Kaaven]

On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Jeremy White wrote:
> What was wrong with the previous implemenation?
> Are you getting a $0 value that doesn't include
> the path?

For some reason I did at the time I tried, yes. Doesn't seem to happen
anymore, but it's probably not portable (i.e. a bashism?) to assume that
$0 is path-expanded anyway, is it?

If "which" is a problem when $0 contains a path, just change it to
something like

if [ "$0" = `basename $0` ]
then argv0_path=`which "$0"`
else argv0_path="$0"
fi

or whatever.