Re: Win64 patch 3/6 (resend)

[Dmitry Timoshkov]

"Ge van Geldorp"  wrote:
> > Why is this required? Is that due to asserts in server/request.c,
> > open_master_socket() ?
>
> Exactly.

What exactly size is required then to avoid an assert?
> > Is changing 'int' to 'long' a better fix?
>
> Perhaps. It would become
>
> struct request_max_size
> {
>    long pad[10];
>    int pad1[6];
> };
>
> then, which seems just as arbitrary.

No, I meant to make it irrespective to 32 or 64-bit compilation,
i.e. look like:

struct request_max_size
{
    long pad[16];
};