Nikolay Sivov nsivov@codeweavers.com wrote:
On 5/6/21 5:41 PM, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Francois Gouget fgouget@codeweavers.com wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: [...]
That another crash happens at the end of test_get_ownerDocument() because priv->properties of doc1 and doc_owner have the same pointer value, and releasing doc_owner after doc1 leads to a double free and heap corruption.
Nikolay, could you please have a look?
I'm one of the rediscoverers and I (re)sent a patch: https://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2021-May/186299.html
Thanks for working on this! Still, I'm waiting for a review of this patchset from the maintainer. Nikolay, could you please either start reviewing assigned to you patches in a reasonable time frame, or stop pretending to be a maintainer?
First you asked someone else to fix an older problem
No, I didn't ask someone else (who is that by the way?), I went ahead and debuugged the problem and sent an analysis to the list. Zebediah then replied: "That's a rather old bug; unfortunately it's been independently discovered several times by now..."
, that sort of blocks test results from your own patches, instead of fixing it yourself.
Do you mean that anyone sending patches must fix test failures caused intermittently by not related things in *existing* tests?
And you while being a manintainer were ignoring this old bug for years https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43377 https://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2018-February/123378.html https://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2018-February/123379.html and now you're demanding me to fix that bug for you? That's rude and incompentent on your part, to say the least.
Now you're complaining that it didn't happen fast enough?
Are you really a maintainer, or just pretending to be the one?