Re: wine/dlls wininet/wininet.spec uxtheme/uxtheme ...

[Francois Gouget]

On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Robert Shearman  writes:
> > Wouldn't it be better to extend the spec format to allow for a longlong
> > type instead?

I was wondering about that too.
> I considered doing that, but I decided it would just add complexity
> for no real reason.  If we really need more detailed parameter info
> then we need to retrieve that directly from the source code IMO.

That's from memory so it should be checked, but I believe winapi_check 
had a hack to check consistency between the spec file and the function 
prototypes in the C files. This patch likely breaks that hack, but more 
importantly winapi_check is going to think that the argument should be a 
double now :-(

A longlong would be nice.