Dan Kegel wrote:
Vijay wrote:
Any comments on why this patch has not been commited http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2004-October/013221.html
Probably because it does not include a conformance test. If you like, you could help by turning http://members.cox.net/~rgalbraith10/wine/bug824/demo824.c into an unattended conformance test by following the example in http://winehq.org/site/docs/wine-devel/testing-test
- Dan
My approach to fixing bug 824 was considered sub-optimal by Alexandre. I also agree and had intended to get back to this with a better solution. Alexandre wants to maintain to the extent possible textual representation of registry data. I now believe the right approach is to simply always explicitly record ascii zeros as '\0' and consistently not consider the end-of-string null terminator as part of the registry data. Alas, I've had no time to test out this approach.
Regards, -Randy Galbraith