On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 6:32 AM, Detlef Riekenberg wine.dev@web.de wrote:
Hi Dylan. After testing your first Patch, i tried this one: patching file dlls/riched20/tests/editor.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 5826 (offset 23 lines). Hunk #2 succeeded at 5856 (offset 23 lines). Hunk #3 succeeded at 6281 (offset 23 lines). patching file dlls/riched32/tests/editor.c
All patches should apply clean. When you send a Patchset, please mark them with [Patch x/y] In this case, [Patch 1/8], [Patch 2/8], ...
I don't understand the problem with applying the patch. It applies cleanly for me, and it seems like it applied cleanly for you too.
The changes are independent, so wouldn't that be a reason to not have them considered a patch set.
And again, new failures in win9x due to the use of UNICODE. (The riched32 test already produce >40 failures in Win9x)
I didn't view/test the following Patches. Please inspect them also for UNICODE faults.
Thanks for catching the Win9x problems, I'll fix the unicode problems
before resending.