Re: Traces: fs -> tid

[Alexandre Julliard]

Francois Gouget  writes:
> Yes, but it would also be the simplest implementation (overdesign can
> be ugly too). And if it's the one off hack that it current looks like it
> is, why not.
>    I propose to just let Alexandre decide which implementation, if any,
> he thinks would be worth including in CVS.

I think we have now wasted enough bandwidth on this non-issue. The
relay traces have always displayed the thread info, and will continue
to do so. People who are morally offended by the extra 5 characters
needed for the tid can hack their local tree, or learn to use
sed/awk/perl.