On Tuesday 19 November 2002 12:09 pm, Vincent Béron wrote:
Greg Turner a écrit:
Actually, I have similar questions about the programs and dlls trees of wine... for example, Alexandre has requested that I remove #ifdef's from rpcss... but can I safely code against the assumption that defined(NO_NAMELESS_STRUCT)? The answer (or, more precisely, the ability to answer for myself without bothering you all about it) lies in knowing what the "officially" supported usage scenarios for the rpcss code are... but I'm not sure I do.
DEFS = @DLLFLAGS@ -DSTRICT -DNONAMELESSUNION -DNONAMELESSSTRUCT $(EXTRADEFS)
in Makeprogs.rules.in should answer one of your questions.
Vincent
that is clear, indeed, but what I don't know is, should I be worried that somebody is compiling, say, under MSVC, completely outside of the control of the wine configure/make, where, in fact, !defined(NONAMELESSSTRUCT) && !defined(NONAMELESSUNION)...?