Re: comctl32: Rewrite the up-down control tests to add message checking

[Dmitry Timoshkov]

"James Hawkins"  wrote:
> -
>        if ((expected->flags & defwinproc) != (actual->flags & defwinproc) && todo)
> -
>        {
> -
>            todo_wine
> -
>            {
> -
>                failcount++;
> -
>                ok_(file, line) (FALSE,
> -
>                    "%s: in msg 0x%04x expecting lParam 0x%lx got 0x%lx\n",
> -
>                    context, expected->message, expected->lParam, actual->lParam);
> -
>            }
> -
>        }

This is an old typo/misleading message that I've fixed in the original msg.c code.