On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Kyle Auble kyle.auble@zoho.com wrote:
On 12/23/2015 05:14 PM, Austin English wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 2:07 AM, Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org wrote:
Austin English austinenglish@gmail.com writes:
I've updated http://wiki.winehq.org/AMD64 (which is what http://wiki.winehq.org/Wine64 redirects to) and http://wiki.winehq.org/BuildingWine (which is what http://wiki.winehq.org/WineOn64bit redirects to)..
Thanks!
I feel like the AMD64 page should be renamed to Wine64 (since it also applies to at least aarch64)..
Agreed.
So I just tried, but I get an error: A page with the name 'Wine64' already exists. Try a different name.
presumably that refers to the redirect, but I'm not sure where that's configured. Perhaps someone else has an idea.
Since I setup the redirects earlier this summer, I remember moinmoin's quirks and can take care of this very quickly tonight.
Great, thanks.
My only question is do you all want to move the "AMD64" page back to "Wine64" wholesale, or should I leave the "AMD64" page and just copy all the text over to "Wine64" for everyone to edit how they want? My logic in making the "AMD64" page in the first place was that it would eventually just become development notes (especially for OS-es besides Linux) and troubleshooting for that architecture. That's why I didn't bother with anything like an "x86" page.
I pictured user-facing stuff and basic instructions going in other docs or main wiki-pages, but if the readme is going to link regularly to the wiki, I can definitely see the value in a "Wine64" page. Does everyone want to dump the "AMD64" page for notes too though?
I don't see the harm in having AMD64 specific information on an AMD64 page, with it linking/referencing Wine64.
I'm more concerned with having a Wine64 page that is useful for packagers/users.