Re: RtlAtom tests further improved

[Alexandre Julliard]

"Dmitry Timoshkov"  writes:
> Instead of inventing our own API to handle multiple local and global atom
> tables, perhaps it would be better to implement NTDLL atom APIs and use them
> when appropriate.

I still haven't seen any evidence that this is needed. Do we really
know of an app that uses the NTDLL atom APIs, or that depends on
having multiple atom tables?  Unless we find one, there's really no
reason to worry about it.