rob@mediasolution.it wrote:
Having more regression testing of applications will help us get to 0.9. If user's can't test one day > becasue they can't compile, that means less testing. It also means we might lose that user as a >tester all together.
Very true. I'm still running 20010510 because newer ones don't run Lotus Notes anywhere near its level. I do have a CVS tree and every now and then do some testing and checking on it, but surely the completeness of this testing is questionable...
The way I think about this, Is that the criteria for stable release should be a criteria for 0.9. By this I mean we need to define what minimum set of programs that work. Initially this could be small, say two dozen core programs and grow from there. At minimum 0.9 should be the start of stable/unstable release.
Tony Lambregts