Re: named pipe oddity

[Dan Kegel]

Mike McCormack wrote:
> I don't know if this is what you want to hear, but I'm rewriting the 
> named pipe code to handle message mode and solve the problem you pointed 
> out, so if you wait a while, I'll have lots of new code for you... 
> though it's probably a good idea to fix the current code first so we 
> have a something that works before I break it again.

That is totally what I want to hear.  I'm adding stuff to the
named pipe regression test; any requests?
> To make a thread go to sleep, you pass in an event flag in your request, 
> then wait on the event flag in the client after the server call returns.

Ah, so the sleeping part isn't visible in server.  Thanks!
- Dan