Re: [PATCH] dinput8/tests: Move HID driver tests from ntoskrnl.exe.

[Rémi Bernon]

On 9/9/21 9:45 AM, Marvin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While running your changed tests, I think I found new failures.
> Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
> wrong, but could you please double-check?
>
> Full results can be found at:
> https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=97632
>
> Your paranoid android.
>
> === w8 (32 bit report) ===
>
> dinput8:
> device.c:130: Test failed: GetDeviceData() failed: 00000000
> device.c:133: Test failed: GetDeviceData() failed: 00000000 cnt:0
>
> === w7u_2qxl (32 bit report) ===
>
> dinput8:
> Fatal: test 'driver_hid' does not exist.
>
> === w7u_adm (32 bit report) ===
>
> dinput8:
> Fatal: test 'driver_hid' does not exist.
>
> === w7u_el (32 bit report) ===
>
> dinput8:
> Fatal: test 'driver_hid' does not exist.
>
> === w8 (32 bit report) ===
>
> dinput8:
> Fatal: test 'driver_hid' does not exist.
>
> === w8adm (32 bit report) ===
>
> dinput8:
> Fatal: test 'driver_hid' does not exist.
>
> === w864 (32 bit report) ===
>
> dinput8:
> Fatal: test 'driver_hid' does not exist.
>
> === w1064v1507 (32 bit report) ===
>
> dinput8:
> Fatal: test 'driver_hid' does not exist.
>
> === w1064v1809 (32 bit report) ===
>
> dinput8:
> Fatal: test 'driver_hid' does not exist.
>
> === w1064 (32 bit report) ===
>
> dinput8:
> Fatal: test 'driver_hid' does not exist.
>
> === w1064_tsign (32 bit report) ===
>
> dinput8:
> Fatal: test 'driver_hid' does not exist.
>
> === w10pro64 (32 bit report) ===
>
> dinput8:
> Fatal: test 'driver_hid' does not exist.
>
> === w864 (64 bit report) ===
>
> dinput8:
> Fatal: test 'driver_hid' does not exist.
>
> === w1064v1507 (64 bit report) ===
>
> dinput8:
> Fatal: test 'driver_hid' does not exist.
>
> === w1064v1809 (64 bit report) ===
>
> dinput8:
> Fatal: test 'driver_hid' does not exist.
>
> === w1064 (64 bit report) ===
>
> dinput8:
> Fatal: test 'driver_hid' does not exist.
>
> === w1064_2qxl (64 bit report) ===
>
> dinput8:
> Fatal: test 'driver_hid' does not exist.
>
> === w1064_tsign (64 bit report) ===
>
> dinput8:
> Fatal: test 'driver_hid' does not exist.
>
> === w10pro64 (64 bit report) ===
>
> dinput8:
> Fatal: test 'driver_hid' does not exist.
>
> === w10pro64_ar (64 bit report) ===
>
> dinput8:
> Fatal: test 'driver_hid' does not exist.
>
> === w10pro64_he (64 bit report) ===
>
> dinput8:
> Fatal: test 'driver_hid' does not exist.
>
> === w10pro64_ja (64 bit report) ===
>
> dinput8:
> Fatal: test 'driver_hid' does not exist.
>
> === w10pro64_zh_CN (64 bit report) ===
>
> dinput8:
> Fatal: test 'driver_hid' does not exist.

Is there a special treatment that I missed for ntoskrnl.exe tests? Why 
does Marvin try to run driver_hid test now?

Is it just because it's a new file and didn't have the spec before?