On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 5:59 AM, Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org wrote:
Module: wine Branch: master Commit: faaccca59be08be547ec4e1948b6306eff3808a2 URL: http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/?a=commit;h=faaccca59be08be547ec4e1948...
Author: Dan Kegel dank@kegel.com Date: Tue Apr 22 17:56:36 2008 -0700
winecfg: Restrict dpi slider to sane values.
programs/winecfg/x11drvdlg.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/programs/winecfg/x11drvdlg.c b/programs/winecfg/x11drvdlg.c index bfa6ec5..c0ec058 100644 --- a/programs/winecfg/x11drvdlg.c +++ b/programs/winecfg/x11drvdlg.c @@ -35,9 +35,9 @@
WINE_DEFAULT_DEBUG_CHANNEL(winecfg);
-#define RES_MAXLEN 5 /* the maximum number of characters in a screen dimension. 5 digits should be plenty, what kind of crazy person runs their screen >10,000 pixels across? */ +#define RES_MAXLEN 5 /* max number of digits in a screen dimension. 5 digits should be plenty */ #define MINDPI 96 -#define MAXDPI 480 +#define MAXDPI 144 /* making this too high surprises and hurts users */ #define DEFDPI 96
#define IDT_DPIEDIT 0x1234
Dan, this basically reverted commit 0110512904d9c646abef416819a057c06d3f2c97, which bumped MAXDPI from 160 to 480 because some users specifically requested the ability for higher DPI settings.
I think we need to decide what we want and stop the tug-o-war.