Re: crosstest compile fix (another)

[Jakob Eriksson]

Hans Leidekker wrote:
> On the other hand, MinGW is still not useful for us even
> if we're sending them patches to fix things every now and 
> then. That, and the poor or outdated state of MinGW RPM 
> packages, and the plans for a PE build of Wine lead me to
> ask myself the question 'Why don't we build our own MinGW
> cross compiler packages?'

Amen.  Not everyone need to "make crosstest". We would come a long way
if testers instead could install the Windows service (not yet written) 
that downloads
the latest crosstest EXE from winehq and runs it.

regards,
Jakob