On Fri Dec 12 0:58 , Michael Stefaniuc sent:
Andrew Talbot wrote:
What is wrong with this patch, please?
If I may venture a guess: You have replaced a nice and concise for loop into and ugly 4 line while loop.
bye michael
Hi Michael,
Ugly? Andrew Koenig and Barbara Moo show a similar construct in their book "Accelerated C++". ;)
But how would you then fix the sign-compare violation, or would you just let this one go?