Re: SafeDisc-1 semi-cleaned note...

[Alexandre Julliard]

Laurent Pinchart  writes:
> If I do so I'll have to update the TIckCount field periodically, which
> will slow down wine for all programs even if they don't access the
> SharedUserData. With a fault handler I can update the fields only when
> required (access from the user program), and thus be faster.

My understanding was that SafeDisc works even if you don't increment
it right?  There's no point in doing extra work for this kind of
hack.