On Tue, 6 Jul 2021, Esme Povirk (she/they) wrote:
Excluding Wine's test cases from the "regression" keyword makes the definition more complicated, so IMO there needs to be a specific reason to do that. Is there a reason we'd want to exclude Wine test case regressions from regression searches?
It would be for people who are looking for things to fix for 'real applications'.
But maybe the open Wine test regressions are rare enough to not drown them out. Also one could presumably perform an advanced search for bugs with the regression keyword but not the testcase one.