Sylvain Petreolle wrote:
Apparently you can get this corruption even if you dont run explorer directly since some programs (like msn) will call explorer.exe.
why dont we apply the patch for the implementation of explorer.exe proposed by Dan Kegel ? It would stop all reports like this.
http://www.winehq.com/hypermail/wine-devel/2003/01/0768.html
If MSN is calling explorer, maybe we should apply the patch regardless of the bug reports. It'd be nice if MSN was closer to working on fake windows.
BTW, my patch only implements one commandline parameter, a directory name. Anyone know if MSN or any other common program uses any of the other options the real explorer.exe offers?
Maybe I should update my patch so the fake explorer aborts if you use an unrecognized option. - Dan