Re: UNC patch

[Alexandre Julliard]

Dan Kegel  writes:
> I agree that faking network mounts is a good thing, but
> parsing mtab makes for much easier configuration.  Instead of
> forcing the user to add a server field, wine can figure it out
> itself.  Isn't that a good thing?  Why force the user to enter
> in duplicate info?

Because you have to enter all the info for the drive configuration
anyway. I agree doing everything dynamically would be better, but it's
a lot more complex. An ugly hack to parse /etc/mtab just for smb
mounts doesn't really seem better or easier to understand than having
to put this info in the drive config.