On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 01:28:57PM +0800, Yeshun Ye wrote:
Signed-off-by: Yeshun Ye yeyeshun@uniontech.com
dlls/iphlpapi/iphlpapi_main.c | 9 ++++++++- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/dlls/iphlpapi/iphlpapi_main.c b/dlls/iphlpapi/iphlpapi_main.c index 09414d26dde..21edd9ee128 100644 --- a/dlls/iphlpapi/iphlpapi_main.c +++ b/dlls/iphlpapi/iphlpapi_main.c @@ -706,9 +706,16 @@ DWORD WINAPI GetAdaptersInfo(PIP_ADAPTER_INFO pAdapterInfo, PULONG pOutBufLen) DWORD i; PIP_ADDR_STRING currentIPAddr = &ptr->IpAddressList; BOOL firstIPAddr = TRUE;
NET_LUID luid;
GUID guid; /* on Win98 this is left empty, but whatever */
getInterfaceNameByIndex(table->indexes[ndx], ptr->AdapterName);
ConvertInterfaceIndexToLuid(table->indexes[ndx], &luid);
ConvertInterfaceLuidToGuid(&luid, &guid);
sprintf(ptr->AdapterName, "{%08X-%04X-%04X-%02X%02X-%02X%02X%02X%02X%02X%02X}",
guid.Data1, guid.Data2, guid.Data3, guid.Data4[0], guid.Data4[1],
guid.Data4[2], guid.Data4[3], guid.Data4[4], guid.Data4[5],
guid.Data4[6], guid.Data4[7]); getInterfaceNameByIndex(table->indexes[ndx], ptr->Description); ptr->AddressLength = sizeof(ptr->Address); getInterfacePhysicalByIndex(table->indexes[ndx],
You should add a test for this. It doesn't have to be as complicated as the one you tried in v3---in testGetAdaptersInfo() add bascially a copy of the above code to generate the expected name from the returned index.
Huw.