Re: Need ideas about ntoskrnl

[Francois Gouget]

On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Peter Beutner  writes:
> > Any reasons given?
>
> Stability is the obvious reason. And also of course the fact that we
> have most of the code we need in ntdll already and none of it in
> wineserver.

Just trying to move things forward and understand because I'm curious:

So the way to do it would be to have ntdll load the drivers in the 
process using them?

Wouldn't that cause problems if a driver expects to be able to maintain 
shared information across processes?

Do we know if this is going to be a problem with the drivers we are 
interested in?