Re: wine-gecko/mono packages (Re: RFC: reducing wasted disk space from addon files)

[Olivier F. R. Dierick]

Le lundi 18 mars 2019 à 19:47 -0500, Rosanne DiMesio a écrit :
> On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 20:56:46 +0100
> Jens Reyer  wrote:
> > On 18.03.19 20:43, Jens Reyer wrote:
> > > The current Wine packages are an example for doing it right: they
> > > install to /opt.
>
> My packages can easily be changed to install to /opt/mono and /opt/gecko. I just don't want to have to create separate mono and gecko packages for each branch.
> > > What I wrote so far is assuming that the packages have different names.
>
> My package names are wine-mono and wine-gecko.

Hello,

Shouldn't the directories be named /opt/wine/{mono,gecko}
or /opt/wine-{mono,gecko}?
/opt/{mono,gecko} look like install directories of linux mono/gecko
packages to me.

Regards,