Re: [PATCH 09/17] widl: Split the expr rule up into multiple rules to fix operator precedence.

[Robert Shearman]

Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> You shouldn't need that, the %left/%right declarations should define the
> correct precedence already. Why doesn't this work for you?

I was attempting to fix the attached case. The result of the expression 
evaluation can be seen in the generated _c.c file by searching for "/* 
Corr desc:  constant, val=".

I see that the issue is that the %left and %right declarations aren't in 
the correct order (and some aren't grouped properly either).

So this bug can indeed be fixed without splitting up expr into multiple 
rules.