23 Mar
2003
23 Mar
'03
9:04 a.m.
On March 22, 2003 01:13 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
It's actually not a dll, only an import library. We don't have a way of implementing that with our import mechanism yet; though we could probably make it a static library at the cost of an extra jump for each function.
Well, I don't think that's a problem -- we need it only for the varargs functions, the inlines work just as well for the vast majority of functions. But if import libs are planned in the near future, what about just adding a forward in the msvcrt.dll for the varargs functions, as a temporary bandaid?
--
Dimi.