Re: IDL/header issues

[Alexandre Julliard]

Ove Kaaven  writes:
> IDL-generated files would also eventually obsolete all the current
> wine/obj_*.h files, but those obj_* files seem to be somewhat more
> logically structured than MS's own IDL files, should we craft Wine's IDL
> files accordingly, and maybe have some top-level .idl files in include/
> and some sub-.idl files under include/wine/, like it's done now in e.g.
> objidl.h?

No, I think we should follow the Microsoft way. Sure it's a mess, but
so is the rest of the API anyway... And every time we tried to do
things better than Microsoft we ended up having to revert it.