Re: [PATCH 2/5] wined3d: Implement copying of buffer resources.

[Józef Kucia]

On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Henri Verbeet  wrote:
> On 18 March 2016 at 12:30, Józef Kucia  wrote:
> > +HRESULT wined3d_buffer_copy(struct wined3d_buffer *dst_buffer, unsigned int dst_offset,
> > -
> >    struct wined3d_buffer *src_buffer, unsigned int src_offset, unsigned int size)
> >
> > +{
> > - BYTE *dst_buffer_mem, *src_buffer_mem;
> > - const struct wined3d_gl_info *gl_info;
> > - struct wined3d_context *context;
> > - struct wined3d_device *device;
> > -
> > - device = dst_buffer->resource.device;
> > -
> > - context = context_acquire(device, NULL);
> > - gl_info = context->gl_info;
> > -
> > - buffer_internal_preload(dst_buffer, context, NULL);
> > - buffer_internal_preload(src_buffer, context, NULL);
> > -
> > - dst_buffer_mem = dst_buffer->resource.heap_memory;
> > - src_buffer_mem = src_buffer->resource.heap_memory;
>
> This is probably fine, but I wonder why you're not using
> buffer_get_memory()? Somewhat related, there may be something to be
> said for the function just taking wined3d_bo_address structures and a
> size, although I don't have an immediate use for that yet.

You're right, buffer_get_memory() should be better in this case.
> > -
> > - if (!dst_buffer_mem && !src_buffer_mem)
> > - {
> > -
> >    if (!gl_info->supported[ARB_COPY_BUFFER])
> > -
> >    {
> > -
> >        FIXME("Direct buffer copy not supported.\n");
> > -
> >        return WINED3DERR_INVALIDCALL;
> > -
> >    }
>
> I think that's fine, but we could of course implement that case by
> mapping the buffers and using memcpy().

It can be implemented. However, I don't expect it to be very useful in practice.