Re: Question concerning internal string usage

[Gerhard W. Gruber]

Francois Gouget wrote:
> Yes, you are supposed to implement xxxA by calling xxxW and not the
> other way around. But historically, the xxxA functions have been
> implemented first and the xxxW came later. And it's easier to just call
> the xxxA function than to move all the code around to do things the
> right way.

Good to know. :)
> Still, the xxxW -> xxxA instances need to be fixed and they, slowly,
> are. You are welcome to lend a hand.

Ah! Currently I'm busy with implementing the boot handling of files.
Takes a bit longer than I expected because I can't devote as much time
as I thought.