Wouldn't using a native kernel32.dll be a bad and a snowballs-chance-in-hell-of-working thing anyway? :)
Regards, | It's always bad news in computing.. and beware | of anything claming to be good news - because | its probably a virus. - Salmon Days Ender | (James Brown) | [Nehahra, EasyCuts, PureLS, www.QuakeSrc.org]
On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Uwe Bonnes wrote:
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 16:18:23 +0200 From: Uwe Bonnes bon@elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de To: wine-devel@winehq.com Subject: Starting application from a directory with some kernel32.dll
Hallo,
when an application is run in a directory, where there is also a kernel32.dll, and this is _not_ the system directory, MODULE_GetLoadOrder doesn't strip the path and therefore crashes when native kernel32.dll is loaded.
While the header of MODULE_GetLoadOrder talks about "any path is stripped", the function only strips the path for "16 bit modules or if the module resides in the system directory "
Is this intended behaviour?
Bye
-- Uwe Bonnes bon@elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de
Institut fuer Kernphysik Schlossgartenstrasse 9 64289 Darmstadt --------- Tel. 06151 162516 -------- Fax. 06151 164321 ----------